You are an idiot and should be disbarred if you "espouse" that anything written here somehow condones criminal behavior. Using your logic, a person that's watching an R-rated movie when a 14 year old walks into the room should be prosecuted as a pedophile.

The very grapic pictures and avatars, posted on this forum, are not suitable for children.
Do you understand, pervert? </div></BLOCKQUOTE>...... No, that was not your point, dumbass. You equated something that is "not suitable for children" to pedophilic acts.

As well as what the police say, when they arrest you. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
I think when I was about 14 was when I realized that if I jack off the stiffy for a while stuff comes out.

OMG you people are so uptight and evidently live a sheltered puritan life </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

Once again, you espouse that because 14 year olds are allegedly aware of sex, it is alright for adults to show them dirty pics.
I've heard that rationale before. Of course, I was defending a pedophile. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
Why do you continue to assume what I wrote alludes to something else?

All I said (if you take the time to actually read it) is that a 1 inch avatar of a covered tit or flaming ass (no pussy in that avatar) is not a big deal for a 14 year old to accidently see and will not shock them. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

You are the one who changes positions, like a snake sheds its' skin.
The premise is that it is improper to show filthy pics, to children. You disagree. My experience is that those who share your opinion are pedophiles. Understand?

walc, it mustta burn you to be defending a pedophile. If I come near a known pedo, I'd be hard-pressed not to kick him in the nuts with a steel-toed boots. Maybe a dozen or so times, just to make sure. Unless he's innocent.

Paragon,
You and others who support showing filth to children are perverted. Understand, Marine wannabe?

That is the problem.
Some accused are innocent and many aren't.
A lawyer doesn't usually know, until late in the process, if ever.

No it's not. You have redirected the premise to satisfy some illegitimate argument you have. What's worse is your condemnation of what's here in direct conflict with your continued participation.

No it's not. You have redirected the premise to satisfy some illegitimate argument you have. What's worse is your condemnation of what's here in direct conflict with your continued participation. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

Wrong, as usual, you inbred child molester.

Is this the manner in which you choose to defend your clients?

No wonder you accept credit cards.

If you guys all do a group hug I'm going to puke...

To show to a child?
It is illegal, in the USA, for an adult to do so. It is child sex abuse.

Is this the manner in which you choose to defend your clients?

No wonder you accept credit cards. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

I consider any insult, from a child molester, like you, is a compliment.
Those of you who advocate that it is OK, to show filthy pictures to children, are morally bankrupt and perverted.

Nice, just like the attorney I would want to represent me if I was wrongfully accused.

Oh wait.......... that's exactly what you've been doing here all night.

If you were browsing the forum with your god daughter and pulled that up, then yes, that would be a bad pic.

And then she goes home and tells mommy and daddy that you showed her pictures of britney spears boobies and you get to explain why you were looking at nude pics with your god daughter. But hey...maybe your family is cool with that, a lot aren't though. Which was the main point, which seems to have been missed. Remember the guy and his god daughter?

But you somehow can reconcile your non-ethical pursuits as somehow taking the high-road.

You, calling me a child molester is somehow morally just...... right!

Yes, but again, it would be different if my uncle gave me the girly mags and looked at it with me.

Which was the point the guy was making... if the 14 year old wants to go online and look at the avatars here, fine. but it's different when an adult is involved.

Nice, just like the attorney I would want to represent me if I was wrongfully accused.

Oh wait.......... that's exactly what you've been doing here all night. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

I wouldn't represent you or any other KKK member.

Exactly.

No, your advocate is the one that has forgotten the "premise" here. It is his fault and irresponsiblity to be browsing this site in the presense of his god daughter if that is what offends.