![]() |
Quote:
No, I can assue that no other trucks were sent. They might be in the station ready to go, but they don't leave. |
I agree, that the search would have been very difficult. Who knows, they may never have found them even with help. It doesn't excuse a lack of effort though.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I didn't read where the 911 operator passed that information (someone screaming) along. While Adam and Jenn were not, a lot of drinking, hollering, and junior behavior goes on at the beach. Quote:
Could have been a lot of things. We know different, now. |
Quote:
I can. |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
But they did search. They searched the most logical places based on the ranger's past experience. Had they been in the ORV section, they would have been found lickity split. They weren't there. It was dark. I must be wrong, but I didn't think it was that uncommon to cancel a search until conditions changed (such as becoming light) if the initial search didn't find anything. |
OK, we'll try this one more time.
Quote:
|
And when the search in the logical places didn't turn anything up another call should have been placed to OnStar to check the status of the vehicle and the search should have been expanded.
|
I give up, I'm going to bed. BTW, all the guys here at the staion wish there were more people out there like you who wouldn't hold us accountable so we could get more sleep at work.
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
It seems that a few new members are jumping in here without reading the entire thread. Furthermore, they are not reading all the info available to them in this thread. Most here are not castigating the Rangers or the Troopers. If you newbies would read EVERYTHING before posting you would see most of us are merely curious as to the truth. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Of course, I must reiterate, I am not blaming the Rangers. Generally, they do a wonderful job. I just want to know what happened. Plain and simple. |
Quote:
Now if I am wrong, then I will have no problem apologizing to all involved. Again, I just want to know what happened with the rescue effort and what caused the roll. |
Didn't they have the vehicle's number? Could they have called it to follow up on the vehicle themselves?
|
Marcmedic, forget it. Hummoron is not interested in a logical answer. He just felt really bad for being an insensitive moron earlier on. Now he needs to feel better about himself. Therefore, he will continue to argue to the death the syntax of his opinions, since they are the excuse for his earlier assholic posts.
All I can say is if I ever do something stupid and needed serious help, I hope to God I reach emergency personnels with your attitude, and not Hummoron's. Thanks for doing a good and noble job! ![]() |
Ditto H2F.
|
Clearly, some of you don't quite understand the way a search works. When a call comes in, an Incident Commander is assigned. It is usually the highest-ranking officer available. He has a scribe, whose job it is to record, on paper, all actions and communications involved in the search as well as the time these occur. He also has assistants assigned to him and he chooses a site commander (the person in charge "on scene", who dispatches everyone there.
The first step is called the bastard search. All of the expected places are checked. This includes bathrooms, restaurants, coves that people frequent. Simultaneously, the assistants are gathering information: cell phone numbers, OnStar numbers, home & work numbers, local accommodation numbers. All of these are called. As much information as possible regarding clothing, ID, provisions and experience of the lost people is gathered and collated. After all this is done, if the person has not absolutely, positively been confirmed as found, what do you think happens? Well, what is supposed to happen is a full-blown multi-agency search with all available resources begins. Why? Because the standard is that the search continues until those lost are rescued or recovered. What actually did happen? Somebody said, “Aw shucks, it's a big area to search, it’s late, they're probably gone by now anyway.” No verification of whether or not that was the case. This violates the most basic principles of the search and is the DIRECTLY ATTRIBUABLE cause of these people not being found until they had expired. This sort of assumption is LETHAL and a total F.U. to lost public taxpayers. When I hear the lame excuses asking "Why didn't someone say longitude and latitude coordinates instead of just coordinates" or "well maybe the ranger didn't have GPS" or how far from the coordinates were they found?" it makes me want to scream. Any ignoramus ranger knows what coordinates are. They all have GPS, and if they don't or don't know how to use them, THEY NEED TO ESCALATE THE SEARCH TO A HIGHER AUTHORITY! When you ask, "What's the Sheriff going to do? Roll a squad car on the sand?" Respectfully, that's none of your damned business!" You have no idea what airships the Sheriff has at his disposal or what interagency agreements exist. NONE OF THIS JUSTIFIES CALLING OFF THE SEARCH. A search NEVER gets called off because someone thinks they're probably okay or gone. This MUST BE VERIFIED and was not. When I hear you say, "They looked in the most likely places" I want to say yes, and they didn't find them. This is like ‘looking for a coin you lost 4 blocks away because the light is better over here.’ Bottom line, this isn’t a question of poor judgment and is not open to conjecture. The wheel doesn’t get invented from scratch when a missing persons call comes in and people don’t sit around and guess what they think happened and they don’t vote on what to do. There are strict protocols to follow and they were not followed. It is entirely possible that, because of this, two young people are dead. NO MORE B.S., NO MORE EXCUSES! |
Quote:
KenP, I was asking my question in direct response to the post above. I hadn't heard anyone mention the hummers having a black box before, hence my "?!" and the end of sentence. I was surprised. Obviously I don't know all the wonderful details about your chosen vehicle. I was further admitting that it could be a great tool to clear up what actually took place. |
Okay, since the moderator is apparently going to close my account, this is probably close to if not my last post on the subject, but have enjoyed my brief stay here, and mostly see intelligent posts on the accident, even though obviously differring views, and appreciate the mostly civil nature of the replies here. That said, I will try and shed a little more light before being booted.
During the striper run at AI, it is usually only fishermen out on the beach at night, and as said, many of us are out there 2-3 days at a time. From personal experience it seems at night there is usually two or three rangers on duty during the night (probably more scheduled come June when the tourists and school kids arrive, but that is when most of us fishermen find other spots until mid September). Generally, before dark, most of us find our night time fishing spot and for the majority stay until it gets light out, so patrolling the beach is a fairly easy deal. Now, as stated before, and know little about GPS, andnot knowing the need of the OnStar operator to give seconds in the co-ordinates, which apparently were not given, and using mapquest, best I could do, seems the co-ordinates give locations from just west of Berlin, MD into the ocean. Another thing I thought of is "where actually was the vehicle found"? Might have been in the State portion of the Park, and maybe the rangers did check the National Park area, finding nothing, if just driving up and down near the water's edge, might take an hour and a half or so. Like I said, does not appear all facts have been release about this event, so we are only coming up with scenerios as to the hows, whats and whys. Anyhow, thanks for letting me share, though to many, my opposing thoughts, and in closing, drive responsible and smartly, because whether Hummers or Jeeps, we are all off roaders, so same family, just different personalities. Be safe, no need to make people think all offroaders are jerks or idiots, which for the record, as a majority, we are not, we are responsible and appreciate and take care of what areas to have fun on are open to us. Just in case my account is closed though, goodbye. If not, if I hear of any more relavent facts, I will let ya'll know. Have Jeep will travel. |
Quote by Shaggy:Just in case my account is closed though, goodbye. If not, if I hear of any more relavent facts, I will let ya'll know. UnQuote:
This is the Hummer Forum! You can't get kicked off here! Don't pay any attention to Alec; he's still confused and thinks your the other Shaggy! Don't leave! We need intelligent people to add to the discussion (even if they drive poo-poo Jeeps ![]() ![]() |
Gee, and I just figured the real reason he wanted me gone was that I drive an '87 Jeep Wrangler, and not my name, cause this is a Hummer board, but thanks H2 Rocks, me just wanting to find the facts, and give what info I can about AI and the rangers.
Can't respond about Linda's post, since it was deleted before I read it, but will say stripersonline is just a bunch of fishermen with four wheel drives that, well hang out and fish. Just seems many times things happen, and the consequences are less than appealing to us. Maybe part of our fear is, enough happens there, we lose our priveledges to fish all night, may be selfish, but that is our escape, and night time is the right time for fishing, just not the time for learning the beach. Also, I believe after dark, people on the beach must be actively fishing, not real sure there, might just be a reference to the fact that no sleeping on the beach after dark, but dozing off during sunlight hours while tanning is permissible. Have Jeep will travel |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:38 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.0.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.