![]() |
diesel
Anyone else think a diesel engine option for the H3 would be a great idea?? I've had a couple of diesels... in fact, I traded a diesel 4X4 truck for my H3... and diesel suits wheeling like nothing else: gobs of torque, low revs, no electrics to get wet, cheaper to run.
GM, if you're reading, think diesel H3!! -Mac |
Re: diesel
Sorry sweetie, we've been busy playing with a troll.
Yes we would love a diesel for the H3. Might be a while, like 3-5 years before we see one in the US. But it will show up eventually.:) |
Re: diesel
diesel = :cool:
|
Re: diesel
Quote:
I don't like the idea, and it will be quite a while before one hits the USA market. But there is one going to Europe next year. |
Re: diesel
I have no desire for a diesel in my H3. I have no desire to have a diesel in any of my vehicles (SUV/sports sedan/sports car).
S. |
Re: diesel
Quote:
Quote:
While I certainly don't aspire to follow Europe's example in most things (especially their penchant for socialism) Europe has diesel available in most models of vehicles. Almost all of their larger vehicles are diesel powered. Here in North America, diesels remain the exception. Given the huge advances and improvements made in the past decade, diesel is an excellent option, especially for vehicles like the H3. -Mac |
Re: diesel
I would not want a diesel in a light duty vehicle.
I wouldn't want to behind a diesel while wheeling. No Thanks Maybe a Cummings diesel if I was towing horses, hogs or hay of a trailer. If you have a leaking gerry can of diesel I wil stink up the truck and won't evaporate. |
Re: diesel
Quote:
They stink, and for the cost of the diesel, as well as the higher cost of diesel fuel, it is not worth the price. I will be satisifed with a nice V8:dancingbanana: . Desert Dan said it best, for this size vehicle, unless you are pulling a farmyard full of animals, a diesel is not necessary. For a vehicle the size of an H2, a diesel might be ok, but if an option, I would not purchase one. |
Re: diesel
Here in Canada, the cost of diesel fuel is about the same as the cost of regular gasoline and much less than premium. I wasn't aware that diesel cost was more in the States.
The smell of diesel fumes are an acquired taste, I suppose, but the new diesels aren't the black-belching monsters of the past. My old Dodge was loud but the new Cummins aren't any noisier than a gas engine and get nearly double the mileage with more torque. The only downside is weight but even that is relative. My wife's grocery getter is a Volksdragon Jetta TDI. It is quiet and smooth running, no smell, gets great mileage and has decent power in a small package. Daimler-Chrysler is plunking their new Bluetec diesel into their 2007 Grand Cherokee. It'll be interesting to see how that works out. -Mac |
Re: diesel
the only Diesel in my Hummer is me... :D
|
Re: diesel
HEY!!!
THE CHIKIN IS BACK!!! WELCOME BACK :excited: |
Re: diesel
thanks baby ;)
|
Re: diesel
Quote:
-Mac |
Re: diesel
WHere's the V8 at? When?
SAVE the deisel for the H2. |
Re: diesel
A deisel would be ok with me, But I would rather have the snorkel set up first.
|
Re: diesel
1 Attachment(s)
|
Re: diesel
Quote:
-Mac |
Re: diesel
Quote:
|
Re: diesel
Quote:
Seriously, your arguments were valid 10 years ago but the technology has advanced remarkably. According to what I've read (yeah, I know... seeing is believing) the Bluetec being produced by Mercedes is cleaner than a gas engine. One of the key differences between European and American diesels has always been the higher sulfur content allowed in American diesel fuel. The oil companies are now producing more refined (ie: less sulfur) diesel which won't produce as much gack to clog everyone's lungs. Advances in technology, better fuel... it's all good. Then there's the biodiesel possibilities. In the meantime, I'm not contrary to gas engines. I didn't buy an H3 to sit in the garage. I'm just open to alternatives. -Mac |
Re: diesel
No. Almost all of our driving is short hops and I think diesels should be warmed up more for best results.
Also, diesel here is $0.70 more at local station which would wipe out any cost advantage. (rip-off) Could the refining costs to remove sulfer be causing the higher cost for diesel? I agree that if large numbers of cars use diesel, we will all pay more hidden for trucking costs. Best regards, Happy Jack |
Re: diesel
Quote:
|
Re: diesel
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
I'm glad to see that you immediately pulled your original reply to Mac and toned it down some, but take it easy. Mac is very correct about new diesel technology, particularly in Europe, where there is a different, cleaner burning fuel technology as well. And not all diesels are horribly dirty. My father drove a Dodge pickup powered by a Cummins turbo diesel (an outstanding, bulletproof engine) for a number of years. There were no choking clouds of black soot spewing out from his exhaust. And being born in 1924, living through the great depression, and serving in WW2, my father, now 82 and a diesel advocate, is certainly not a member of the "me" generation. I find it rather ironic that you, driving a vehicle that gets around 16 mph, is preaching about vehicle emissions and efficiency. Why don't you do the responsible thing and by a vehicle that gets 32 mpg and produces exactly half the emissions of your H3? Instead, you drive down the highway "spewing" twice the carcinogens and greenhouse gasses than you need to, while wagging your finger at others. I don't find your arguent to be very credible from an environmental standpoint. Perhaps take another tack. Attachment 34152 |
Re: diesel
I just traded a 1996 Dodge pickup with the Cummins turbodiesel 5.9 litre. We have emissions testing in Vancouver and the last time I had it tested, the opacity was 2.36% according to my records so no black cloud of smoke.
As for whether I understand the refining of aliphatic hydrocarbons or not, gasoline is a mixture of C7H16 through C11H24, all which boil at temperatures lower than water which is why they evaporate so readily. Kerosene, diesel and other fuel oils are in the C12Hn to C17Hn range. The denser oils and solid waxes (C18Hn through C80Hn) are typically cracked (a refinement process used to literally split apart heavy hydrocarbons into lighter ones) and later reformed using a process called alkylation but diesel isn't cracked as it's a desirable commodity. I started this thread to discuss the idea of a diesel engine for the H3. The H1 had diesel engines since the beginning and, from what I've read, many people would welcome a diesel option in the H2. Others expressed their opinions both yea and nay. From your posts, I'm not sure if your problem is with me or diesels or both. If I did something to upset you, it wasn't intentional (especially since I have no idea what your beef is) but if you're hoping to impress or intimidate me, you've failed on both counts. -Mac |
Re: diesel
Quote:
I drive a Duramax. I'd LOVE to have that engine and transmission in an H2, and a 6 cylinder version in the H3. Better mileage BY FAR better mileage. Off road, diesel's the ticket, it's torque off idle is a perfect match for the conditions. Catalytic converters have been on diesels for a while now, they're not clogging up any more than any other vehicle. New for '07 WILL be particulate filters. They will not clog up either. They're designed to go into a self clearing burn off mode to keep it clear. They won't last forever though and will have a projected lifespan of about 100k miles. People that don't like diesels haven't owned one. There's not a gas engine out there that will pull, or give the mileage of any of the big three diesel pickup truck engines. My Dmax is no more noisey than some chucklehead's aftermarket exhausted anything. It doesn't make smoke. To keep this discussion real: The H2 is going bye-bye unless they put a diesel in it to bring the mileage up. It takes torque to maintain the thing at freeway speeds, at a low rpm, and get good mileage. The H3 could benefit from ANY engine upgrade. I'm imagining that six cylinder Dmax with a sweet six speed behind it and getting in the mid 20s on mileage. Ohhhhhh yeah!:dancingbanana: |
Re: diesel
Quote:
-Mac |
Re: diesel
Quote:
x2 :beerchug: |
Re: diesel
That's a dream at best.:)
S. |
Re: diesel
Dreams don't become reality in the auto world without customer demand. Hell, they built the SSR and Prowler didn't they? How far fetched were THOSE things?
|
Re: diesel
Quote:
Agreed, dreams are worth striving for in the automotive world. But from a business standpoint, SSR's and Prowlers are marginal at best both technically and economically. S. |
Re: diesel
I'm holding out hope for a nice turbo diesel. I personally agree with the original poster, and feel a nice modern turbo diesel would be an excellent engine choice for the H3, especially if offered with a manual transmission. Clean, considerably better fuel efficiency, excellent off idle torque. I doubt that GM will be able to have the vision to see the possibilities though. They are only doing it in Europe because the truck would be doomed without it there. Europeans love their diesels, and for good reason.
|
Re: diesel
Quote:
|
Re: diesel
:iagree:
Any costs previously saved by using diesel have also disappeared here. Until we develope our fuel resources to the point where we can :fdance: to the Middle East, I am afraid we are at the disposal of thieving oil barons and robber refineries everywhere. :violin: |
Re: diesel
2 Attachment(s)
Quote:
I hate calling someone a liar, but you sure DID change your post. I was in the middle of replying to your original message to Mac when an error occurred (when you deleted your original). I just happened to save a particularly rude portion of it. Here it is: Typical diesel owners just brag about their mpg while they go spewing their soot and carcinogens down the highway. Sure if your inside it you don't smell it everybody else has to. I guess your part of the me only generation and to hell with everybody else. for your information I'm in the automotive industry as well. Look familiar? It should. You wrote it. Attachment 34206 Quote:
Promise? Attachment 34207 |
Re: diesel
Quote:
Fact? What facts, Lenny? The fact you're WRONG about diesels, the fact you tried and FAILED to impress with your "extensive" knowledge and experience or did you have some other "facts" which only exist in your head? :shhh: Now you've finally aired your true objection... you don't like cops. :twak: Yeah, I saw your remark on the other thread. Funny for a guy who's been on this forum for a couple of months to be making smarmy remarks about me being a newby and how ironic for YOU to be telling ME to lighten up!! :p I don't know nor care why you don't like cops but if you're not man enough to deal with me for who I am, not what I do for a living, what does that say about you? ;) For other who wish to continue discussing the possibility of a diesel H3, maybe even explore what size/type/configuration would work best, I would like to continue this thread despite the PROUD REBEL. Please excuse my redress of Lenny's nonsense. I've found it's best to put bullies in their place quickly and move on... -Mac |
Re: diesel
........:popcorn:
|
Re: diesel
:yawn:
S. |
Re: diesel
The Jeep Liberty is available with a 2.8-liter four-cylinder motor that provides adequate power and 26 mpg with a 4 speed automatic tranny. When I test drove a Liberty, about the only thing which impressed me was the engine and even that was only adequate.
Since the H3 comes with an inline five, I took a look for inline five diesels and found this interesting article as well as numerous articles on the Dodge Sprinter which has an inline five turbodiesel giving 154 horsepower and 243 pounds-feet of torque. Hmmmm, more HP would be nice but that torque number looks good for a start. -Mac |
Re: diesel
Let's see if the Holden H3 they sell in Australia has a diesel option.
I still see fewer gas stations with diesel here in CA. I haven't seen any E 85 yellow pumps yet |
Re: diesel
Quote:
One barrel of crude oil is 42 gallons. Out of that you will get roughly 19.4 gallons of gas and 9.7 gallons of home heating oil/diesel fuel. The cracking process will yield about 42 gallons of products. |
Re: diesel
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
That little 4 banger diesel puts out 295 ft-lbs at 1800 rpm. That's a lot of torque for 2.8 liters !!! It's all on the low end though ... drops off really fast after the peak, but still matches the 3.5L max even at 4000 rpm. Not much HP tho ... peaks at 160 HP. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:46 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.0.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.