3.7L 5 Cylinder vs.........
i love my H3, but i think the H3 should have been a 4.0L V6. anyone else agree?
|
Re: 3.7L 5 Cylinder vs.........
The 4.2L from the Trailblazer OR Envoy would have been a better choice, but if you compare the MPG ratings between the 5 cyl and the 8 cyl I would say the V8 is the better pick. Doesn't have to work as hard, and would probaly end up with the same gas milage or God fobbid Better MPG's . Just my .02 :D
|
Re: 3.7L 5 Cylinder vs.........
Quote:
|
Re: 3.7L 5 Cylinder vs.........
I disagree. With the 3.5 in a 06 its got everything & saves some mpg over the v6 and v8!
|
Re: 3.7L 5 Cylinder vs.........
Why not a 5.0 HO or an 8 litre with a 4:11 rear, 6 on the floor, quad exhaust, flames, dice and fur...
do you want a drag car, a drive in restaurant cruiser or a HUMMER ... make your mind up !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
Re: 3.7L 5 Cylinder vs.........
Quote:
|
Re: 3.7L 5 Cylinder vs.........
Quote:
:drama: :popcorn: :drama: :notallthere: |
Re: 3.7L 5 Cylinder vs.........
Quote:
|
Re: 3.7L 5 Cylinder vs.........
A V6 was in the works for the H3 in 2010 but that has all been shelved because of what GM is doing with the brand...
I personally like the I5, it gets the job done for what the truck was meant to do. It's not a race car, and it never was meant to be. This reminds me, I watched the Aussie Top Gear on youtube yesterday, what a joke. They raced an H2 Limo around their track... What are these people smoking? |
Re: 3.7L 5 Cylinder vs.........
Quote:
|
Re: 3.7L 5 Cylinder vs.........
The I-5 does have to stress a lot and that goes for small tasks such as passing another vehicle on the freeway. It'll be interesting to see if these motors can handle 150K+ miles with all the stress and high revving it displays.
|
Re: 3.7L 5 Cylinder vs.........
Quote:
I think the future will show the I-5 is and was a great engine ! |
Re: 3.7L 5 Cylinder vs.........
Quote:
|
Re: 3.7L 5 Cylinder vs.........
i think with gas situations there not gonna consider getting rid of this engine.
|
Re: 3.7L 5 Cylinder vs.........
Well i stuck on a K&N filter, Jet Tbody spacer, Jet performance chip and a Gibson side exit exhaust. I have noticed a decent power increase, really improved throttle response and my im figure'n out my milage this week. So ill let you know how that goes. Maybe you should give those a try.
|
Re: 3.7L 5 Cylinder vs.........
Quote:
How about some photos of the side exhaust !!! |
Re: 3.7L 5 Cylinder vs.........
Quote:
Dam Im expecting 250,000 + miles I find it doesnt work to hard climing hills, Unless the 4,000 lb campers hooked up then it strugles to get up the long steep hills. I find when towing go into the hill at 65 to 70MPH then by the top I end up about 50MPH and it will stay in 3rd gear.If I try to keep it at 55 or 60MPH it goes down to 2nd and revs about 5,000 + RPM and fights to climb the hill. |
Re: 3.7L 5 Cylinder vs.........
Quote:
|
Re: 3.7L 5 Cylinder vs.........
1 Attachment(s)
You can always slap one of these puppies on for some power! Turbo Charger guaranteed 125 HP for the 3.5 and the 3.7L
Attachment 49819 |
Re: 3.7L 5 Cylinder vs.........
and who warrenties the engine and drive train after you install it...
OBAMA !!!:dancingbanana: |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:29 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.0.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.