mullet-
Ok, first... The only reason I list my height and weight is because I was pretty sure that was one of the inadequacies you were associating to H2 ownership (which I was correct with since you brought it up regarding females). I should have expected you to come back with some sort of snide remark. My wife would strongly disagree with you since I wear a size 36/38 in the waist on all of my pants. Having just completed Navy Seal PT Training here in Houston, I'll have you know that any lard was easily replaced with muscle during the course of this program. I do have to fault Rice University with making me the size I am now though. Had it not been for college football, I would probably be a weak snivling little bitch lawyer like yourself.
However, all juvenile remarks regarding my size and your stupidity aside, I will address your first two legal questions and then move on to the more pertinent matters of your reasons for not liking the H2...
1) The secured party files a financing statement (I understand there are several ways to perfect a security interest-filing a financing statement is just one of those ways) in the state under whose law they are organized.
2) It's an unconditioned writing that promises payment of a certain amount of money
However, I'd rather not go back and forth with you on legal q&a's... I appreciate the questioning and it required me to think a little yet, the REAL reason for my repost is to counterpoint your reason for not liking the H2...
1)You really need to watch SteveR's films and look at his pics on some of his trips out in the California "countryside". You also need look at some of HUMMERTEAM's pictures from KATEMCY (which many people consider to be a miniMOAB in the Texas Hill Country), as well as, look at DRTYFN's pics from the RUBICON which he just got back from; before making such stupid statments as that.
2)The H2 actually uses quite a few renewable products in its make-up. Hummer has a little flyer detailing this info. Additionally, as I have already mentioned, mpg is no worse that some other suvs and trucks already out there.
3) I would argue that in the stock form with the 35" tires, ground clearance, and spacing of wheels on the body, approach/departure angles, that it is easily a better off-road vehicle than almost all the vehicles you mentioned. The wheelbase and appproach/departure angles allow it to easily travel over terrain that would be quite difficult for the jeeps with their shorter wheelbase or the toyota's with their poor front and rear angles.
4&5)Man, that is just stupid to post. It's actualy statements like these that make you look very uncredible with your lawyer claims.
6)I've listed in #3 why it would be more capable than a Tahoe, yes, it does get worse gas mileage (it weighs freaking 6500 lbs.) and it would of course have less cargo space being that it is shorter in length than a Tahoe.
7)Just another stupid post.
And again, I have to finish my post by referring to you as a mullet again... Please, next time come with something of more substance.
Thanks.
-Wayne
[This message was edited by HUMMERDOGG on 11-14-03 at 11:34 PM.]
__________________
-HUMMERDOGG
|