<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by OrangeCrush:
Did any of ya'll read the blogger's opinions afterwards. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
I read quite a few. What a hoot! My favorite
:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content"> Anonymous said...
has anyone thought of this??
three hummers, in perfect condition, ready to be manned with "homeland security" people and jsut drive off?
they hold maybe 10 men each?
these hummers can essentially go anywhere, as long as there is fuel?
in the locale, would some "casual research" reveal a seeming "surplus" of multi-purpose fuel tankers?
how about the distance from any sort of a "homeland security rayy point"?
if the 300 hummers can carry comfortably about 5 "security persons", excluding the driver, that means that with sufficient fuel, how many of same could be deployed?
a battalion of "security personnel consists of around 600 persons or so, last time I looked.
a "rump regiment" consists of essentially 2 bttalions with support.
can these hummers carry 81mm mortars with mortar bombs to sustain a 5 day "peace securing operation"?
the entire article gave me the creeps.
sorry but I tend to look off to the right and left when I indulge in linear analysis.
jz
</div></BLOCKQUOTE>