View Single Post
  #12  
Old 12-30-2005, 06:28 PM
Steve - SanJose
 
Posts: n/a
Default

<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by f5fstop:
The life cycle of most vehicles is 5-7 years without any major changes. I believe, that with the H3, GM sees other avenues to explore, and they are doing it and the costs for these additional items is not that expensive.
Painting a grill or chroming a brush guard does not require extensive crash testing to validate.
The expensive items that everyone seems to be waiting for will come in 2008. If a new engine is designed into the vehicle, extensive tests must be performed, as well as crash tests (and these aren't inexpensive), as well as fuel economy and emissions testing.
I would never purchase one of these street machines, but there appears to be a market, and I believe that GM is smart in jumping on the bandwagon to provide these updates to the consumer.
As a GM employee, I like them because all profits help to save the company; as a consumer, I believe it is smart for any company to provide what the consumer wants. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

Yea, kind of another form of "badge engineering", and not nearly as lame as some of GM's other work at Pontiac, Buick, Saab.

S.
Reply With Quote