Ok - so let me get this straight. I am supposed to believe a third party evaluation from some jackass who can not: A) Tell the difference between a H2 and an H3; and who does B) Use one example of mechanical failure to deplore an entire vehicle line; C) Base an evaluation on the opinion of someone who is likely disgruntled???
This can be likened to never taking and banning penicillin because some people are allergic to it or banning sex because some nutsmack doesn't use a condom and gets a STD.
Three words for ya pal (and in response to the corresponding letter):
A) Validity of Methodology / Findings
B) Reliability of Methodology / Findings
C) Subject Bias / Sample Size
If you are unable to comprehend those statements, please feel free to Google "Research Methods 101".
I am sooooo glad I earned my PhD so I can properly analyze research, disseminate findings based on fact, and call out bozos like the "rocket scientist" that started this thread.
