You are so full of yourself you can't read simple words. The colorful additions I bring to conversation is normal everyday conversation even amongst my liberal friends, or do you always talk with operating room sterility?
So ... 'yer an idiot', 'you pansy assed f*cking liberal', 'suck my dick', 'stfu', and the rest of your mindless insults are just colorful additions to your daily conversation? omfg dude, where do you get off? Swearing was never the problem. The problem is using profanity as a weapon against people who disagree with you or as a substitute for reason or explanation.
Just because the word is written, doesn't mean it has to be boring. If you want bland granola-encrusted comments, I suggest you seek a heavily modded technical forum where skin thickness is of no concern.
There you go with the stereotypes again. Who wants a 'bland granola-encrusted argument'? I don't. How about this instead ... try disagreeing with people using a compelling rational argument based on your knowledge and experience ... because 'STFU' and 'yer an idiot' aren't getting it done. Apply that arrogant, superior intellect of yours to the issue and stay the f*ck on topic.
As far as your comments.
I didn't say you said he sacrificed morale for political gain. I am the one that said he didn't. You inferred that if he would have sacrificed morale, he would have had political gain.
There ya go puttin words in ma mouth agin. I never mentioned morale ... just the irony of a political decision that backfired.
On to the rest of your gibberish
(that's what I'm talking about, mindless insults). Being a flaming liberal (not a conservative or near centric as you have attempted to portray yourself) one would assume you would be very in touch with your artistic self.
There ya go gettin all stereotypical again. As if you knew my position on every issue to call me a 'flaming liberal'. And as if being any kind of liberal would make me an art expert. 
The name of the painting is "Face-off" and nearly all of Mark Kostabi's artwork lacks defined facial features. The painting can be interpreted 2 ways. Face off as the name suggests or more introspectively, as one looking in at one's self.
Thank you for the explanation. I don't know much about art and that wasn't obvious.
Nope, you are too shallow and such a social coward that is far fetched for you to grasp. Your attempt a moral superiortiy through lack of profanity or any other colorful adjectives or adverbs is duly noted, but it is only a huge light that shines on the typical liberal viewpoint. You NEED to feel morally superior and grasp onto what you feel is a taboo social more' and use that as feed for your little fire to cover how you really act...... human.
There ya go with the lies and assumptions again. Except for serious discussions, my posts have plenty of sh!ts, dams, f*cks and OMGs ... so it's no social taboo for me. Mindless, emotional outbursts like yours discredit you a lot more than they help in a debate.
'tis truly sad that so many of us have way much more fun on an internet forum pointing out ignorant and shallow viewpoints such as yours, while you flop down into your futon and pretend to take the "high road."
Everyone's ignorant on some things and shallow on others. The trick is to be teachable. I don't stand on the hill beating my chest and bellowing mindless insults to bully people into submission. I don't lose my temper (or stop posting) when someone has good arguments or a different point of view. I don't back down when my opinion is unpopular. And when I'm wrong, I admit it instead of retreating into insults and profanity. I state my opinion and explain where I'm coming from. Then I learn from the responses. That's not cowardice.
And I manage to do it while being civil and staying on topic. Call that the high road if you want ... sure smells better than the sh!te all over your road.
You know, as fun as this has been, I'm done with this unless you can respond on topic with a rational clear-headed opinion that isn't based on assumptions, stereotypes, lies, distortion or insults. Later.