Agreed. But do you think that the Military is going to be able to take care of business as they should with the current rules of engagement? When I think about the mid easts' past history I cannot help but feel that they do not know peace without bloodshed. Not to say that there has been no bloodshed in Iraq, but I dont think that the American way of building Democracy in Iraq is keeping within in the past history of the region. I think to be more effective in Iraq the rules of engagement need to be changed, I dont think that the current rules are set up in a way that is biased (for lack of a better word) towards the troops. I think we have tried to put the people of Iraq before our troops, and in turn there has been bloodshed against our soldiers that would not have occured otherewise.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by deserth3
Gee how to put this...
Tell all the critics, second guessers, and arm chair want to be wariors to sit down and shut their yaps when an accident happens and let the military do what their best at. Taking care of buisiness.
Was that too harsh?
|