
01-05-2007, 08:08 PM
|
 |
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 24,247
|
|
Re: Jeep versus H3
Quote:
Originally Posted by stagger_lee
Not fan of the H2 at all. Not functional in my opinion, for the more serious off-roader. I have owned scouts, I own a 71 FJ 40, and have wheeled the crap out of my brothers 06 FJ loaded with manual trans and lockers. The Jeep Rubicon is probably up there as well in the top 3 best factory capable vehicles. I dont think that the H2 was supposed to be a capable off roader from the factory, I think the H3 was more headed in that direction. Smaller, lighter, better clearence, bigger tires, etc. But honestly how many people are out there running Moab and The Rubicon daily, a handful, maybe. To the wifeys and the occasional mountain explorer or skiier/snowboarder its more about status then capability, and most 4x4s will get the job done. Try running the Little/Old Sluice or Soup Bowl (Rubicon Trail) in a stock H2, not happening. I like H3s and will be buying one, test drove last night, and it will be my first GM vehicle, so just letting everyone know before I get bashed, that I love em, and Im buying one. 
|
Scouts were pieces of crap. You say "serious off-roader" and Scout in the same post.... get real. And Yep, I've wheeled Scouts, back in High School and for the one we wheeled, we had a whole spare back at the farm so we would have parts to scavenge from when it would break.
We
|