Quote:
|
Originally Posted by bparker
I am sure you have heard that Howard Stern produced a will Anna signed from 2001 naming Howard Stern executor of her trust and that she is leaving any and all assets to her son AND NOTHING to any future husbands and or future children.
Having said all of that - lets break this down:
Howard Stern = Attorney + Husband + Executor of Anna'a trust and assests
Son = the sole benefeciary in the event of Anna's death.
Is this NOT a perfect motive for Howard Stern to kill them both with Methadone + other drug over doeses?
Since Anna's son is dead the point of her will was void and now that Anna's dead the sole benefeciary is Howard Stern the controller of her trust.
Perfect motive for murder??
Please discuss,
|
I'm not too sure about that. My friend's dad left a family friend as the executor of his trusts and assets for his 4 sons for when he dies, which he did. The sons are, of course, still living .. but all the executor ever got was a small salary for taking the job. I 'think' that if anything happened to the 4 sons, then any trusts and assets would have gone to the next of kin, be it an aunt, uncle, cousin, etc... someone in the 'family' who wasn't in the will. But, if your hunch is right ... then it appears Stern's acts are blatant and the whole thing suspicious.