Thread: Rubicon VS H2
View Single Post
  #16  
Old 02-07-2003, 05:33 PM
muskyman muskyman is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Barrington IL/ Minocqua Wi
Posts: 49
muskyman is off the scale
Default

socal,

dont be so fast at getting "more aggresive" tires.

tires get there traction from the grooves across the face not the deapth of the grooves

deep grooves and large voids improve cleaning of the tread .but because the have far less cross grooves they sacrifice traction for that cleaning.

in many situations such as sand,loose dirt, or slick surfaces like ice or snow covered roads a AT(all terrain) tread will far outperform a MT(mud terrain)

the guys with the mud terrains will argue with that but they will also be wrong

what happens is the aggresive tire digs deep but lacks the cross grooves that provide the traction so the tire looses traction and starts digging the hole it then gets stuck in.

the only times MT's have the edge is when a AT tread gets clogged and wont clean itself,or when you are rock climbing and the large voids allow the rocks to to get deep enough into the voids to allow enough mechanical contact that the vehicle lifts itself without tire spin.

MM

Musky:the thinking mans fish

Dirt is for playing roads are for getting there
__________________
Musky:the thinking mans fish

Dirt is for playing roads are for getting there
Reply With Quote