Quote:
|
Originally Posted by PARAGON
read some things literally and then take your own license on others?
I believe it to be quite clear...... look up the definition of coefficient.
It is quite logical to assume that stated engine dyno'd BHP is X and that someone runs a dyno on a chassis dyno and shows a difference of -80HP, that one would use the number 80. Never did I say absolute, that's where you took your liberty. I'm not the one pitching the BS here.
And finally, you are simply lying. I, in no way, suggested that drivetrain loss decreased with the increase in HP. I said that the chart showed a net gain of 13 HP. You chose 17-18 HP by pulling it out of your ass as there is no way to assume a 5 point difference by that chart.
Now, try and work your way into any fcking credibility on this site now, turd. You want to argue points, fine.
You don't get the chance to take your liberties with what others have stated. Move on, you're done here.
|
"There is no 100HP difference between BHP and rear wheel HP, which is what is being shown. Stock listed BHP for the H3 is what? somewhere around 220BHP and the stock rear wheel HP listed on the graph is about 138 HP. The coefficient for friction doesn't increase as the HP increases so one could naturally assume a 80HP difference. 153 + 80 = 233 or a net gain of about 13 BHP or somewhere around a 6% gain."
If the coefficient of friction doesn't increase as the HP increases (based on your quote) then the HP doesn't decrease as the HP decreases. Here you used a fixed HP loss value of 80 HP.
"Never did I say absolute, that's where you took your liberty. I'm not the one pitching the BS here."
80 is an absolute number.
You also said that the stock rear wheel hp from the graph is 138. First, understand that the H3 is a 4WD vehicle as has to be dynoed on an all-wheel drive dyno. This isn't rear wheel hp it is wheel hp. Then you said the new new HP curve has a peak hp of 153. Isn't 153 - 138 = 15 hp??? These are your numbers. Where's the net 13 BHP coming from that you calculated??? Where's the 13 HP that you keep referring too???
"There is no 100HP difference between BHP and rear wheel HP"
Correct. According to your numbers 220 - 138 = 82 hp. Then you are using 80 as a hp difference.
All I did was take the numbers that you posted and consolidated them. You biased each number in your favor. Now, who is taking the liberties.
Stick to your happy meal word search, and help Ronald find the hamburgerler. We're all counting on you!
When you reply, as you know you will, let's try not using the playground words like: turd, dummy, dumber, dumb, etc. as you seem to refer to everyone as.