My jeep is offically better than a $55,000 plus suv...

[PARAGON]

<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Superman:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by PARAGON:
To describe you, I could not have said it any better. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

So let me get this straight. Money is no object. If I was going to build my H2 I would pull the front susp. Install a rc60 from an 05 super duty with some sort of selectable locker. I would then put a Klune V underdrive on the tc. I now have a vehicle with solid axles, more ftlb/lb, and a TRUE 4wd system with REAL lockers (in other words, grade no longer matters in the "10% grade on one wheel" claim, just axle shaft strength now, which is much higher in the front now). I now have a setup more comparable to a rubicon.

You would consider these upgrade useless by your logic. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>Soooo, now you want to pretend logic has something to do with your postings.

I don't think you quite understand things completely here. Having a "setup" comparable to a Rubi has nothing to do with the vehicles' capabilities being comparable. So, your little waste of time looking up some 4WD buildup info is quite wasted. Why not just give the H2, the Rubi's complete suspension and drive-train systems? Now that would make their setups more comparable.

Besides, I simply requested that you provide us with standing facts where the Rubi has "out-done" the H2. How hard is that if there is such vast difference in their "setups?"