Jeep versus H3

[DRTYFN]

Originally Posted by stagger_lee

Not fan of the H2 at all. Not functional in my opinion, for the more serious off-roader.You're not much for researching or paying attention, are you? I have owned scouts, I own a 71 FJ 40, and have wheeled the crap out of my brothers 06 FJYour standard of wheeling is considerably lower than ours. loaded with manual trans and lockers.Did you enjoy having to run premium fuel in the FJ? The Jeep Rubicon is probably up there as well in the top 3 best factory capable vehicles. I dont thinkYour problem is your inability to think clearly. that the H2 was supposed to be a capable off roader from the factory, I think the H3 was more headed in that direction. Smaller, lighter, better clearence, bigger tires, etc.Uhm retard, you do know that 35>33, right? But honestly how many people are out there running Moab and The Rubicon daily, a handful, maybe. To the wifeys and the occasional mountain explorer or skiier/snowboarder its more about status then capability, and most 4x4s will get the job done.Or you could just buy an A4 wagon and be a total trolling fag. Try running the Little/Old Sluice or Soup Bowl (Rubicon Trail) in a stock H2, not happening.Try it in a stock Rubi and get back to me. I like H3s and will be buying one, test drove last night, and it will be my first GM vehicle, so just letting everyone know before I get bashed, that I love em, and Im buying one.

Post a picture of the alleged H3 immediately or you're banned.