Pissed and Need to Vent

[DennisAJC]

I'll invite you to camp in our woods. B.C. is #2 in the world for Satanic worshippers.

[Hart1]

<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content"> Simple but effective - my guys would kick my arse if I even used the word esoteric - they would automaticaly think I had turned into some raving tree hugging soap dodger and beat me to death. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

Many have been "nailed to the cross" for that exact same reason!

Licking my wounds on the H2 fourm....Hart

[usetosellhummer]

Need to just keep things in check. Face it, you changed someone's life today because he hurt your pride, you did bust your ass and having a hummer or a jet is fine. It would help him and you if you were to teach him something instead. Oh well next time just think about it. People like him need leaders like you to teach and maybe it's not too late to do something about it. You did not fire him for cause, it was for feelings. I'm done and man I made a **** load of money off pompus sold on their sucess folks. I just saying to think next time mine thats all, you meet the sme people going down, as on the way up.

[KenP]

James, good for you. What the hell does he care what you have anyway. It's your business. He should be thanking you for the job he just lost. That really pisses me off. And knowing you've had issues with employees recently really turns my battery red. Glad you fired the prick.

Shaggy, if the comments would have been directed to James in the right tone I could see it as a joke. But James overheard the dumbass saying it to someone else. F-him.

James, I don't know how unemployment works there compared to here, but here's some advice. Fight against it the whole way. If you're ruled against, appeal it. I've employed people for quite a few years and have NEVER paid unemployment. The best thing is they win round one, get a few checks, then lose round two. They have to pay all the money back!

[PARAGON]

<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Hart1:
No, the e is silent. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>So, you are saying that Webster's dictionary is wrong and the proper way to say the word is "soteric."

If that is the case I guess you would pronounce especially as "specially".

[Hart1]

Tower:

""You state your opinion as fact or "information." ""

Really, I used "My current viewpoint" too and often, why did you leave this out? sort of changes your context, does it not? Now it is my turn to "guess" about you: I think you are confusing confidence with your fear of what I offered to James.

"""You...."""
"""you..."""
""you...."""

lol. I have never approached anyone like this ever. Kettle, pot, black? Who knows?

"""You state your opinion as fact or "information." You fail to see that you are just the same as the rest of u..."""

False, never, ever claimed any information here as "Fact"

However, it is a fact that "there is another way" to address James problem. True?

"""""Everyone here sees you as narcissistic"""

Everyone? Is that a fact? How do you know? Even if this was the case, Argumentum Ad Populum is really a fallacy that does not prove anything. Nice try...


Once more, sorry, that was not my intent!

[HUMMERDOGG]

Hart1-

You are as original as MAC was. I enjoy the spirited posts. Keep it up. It at least gives us something to debate.

Late.

[Andy C]

<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Hart1:
I have discussed this before with friends, some blow it off, others ask for more information. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

What percentage ask "WTF are you talking about"

[Klaus]

Here's another training film for hospitality in this part of the world:

[DRTYFN]

<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by ShaggyZr2:
I work in a "professional" environment (i.e., Business Casual...as professional as I have ever been)...but I still completely believe that some playful ribbing is necessary every once in a while. Even with the boss, or the bosses boss. That being said...his comments dont appear to be intended as a cute joke or sarcastic comment. That sounds like a cheap shot to me. Can his ass...and hire me. I bet I could do the same job for 1/2 the price. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

Hippie bark-chewing is a professional environment?

Dock that subversive turd 2 weeks pay.

<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by h2co-pilot:
To me, any employee that injects negativity on team should be given an intense warning or notice. Especially when sporting a disrespect for a higher authority.

This disrespect in turn invokes a dissatisfaction in other employees leading to poor production = less revenue = less funds for golf trips = less profit. Kind of a Maslow Theory thing.

clink clink </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

Yeah, on second thought... fire that POS.

[JamesT]

The Hummer itself has Zero to do with this. It cant be put first over business nor the staff. It is irrelavant (sp) I am putting the business and the rest of the staff over one person who HAD the ability to cause a cancer in my business. You are WAY too anylitical for me. I only got a G.E.D. Good Enought Diploma


<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Is the statement true about putting the Hummer first over your business and employees? If you are honestly not doing this, then why the perception that you are? </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

[PARAGON]

Take the esoteric path to the local library and look up "information" in the dictionary.

[partsguy]

<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by ShaggyZr2:
Nice. So when do I start? </div></BLOCKQUOTE>Can you
say relocate.congrats Shag!!!!Maybe Seth and
Joyce will put you up for awhile.

[h2co-pilot]

To me, any employee that injects negativity on team should be given an intense warning or notice. Especially when sporting a disrespect for a higher authority.

This disrespect in turn invokes a dissatisfaction in other employees leading to poor production = less revenue = less funds for golf trips = less profit. Kind of a Maslow Theory thing.

clink clink

[NJ H2]

Bust his ass everyday until he quits!!
Why should you pay his unemployment!

[PARAGON]

First, I'll warn you. You are way over your head. One should not assume things as others have tried in the past. You start first by lying about your posts, yourself and things in general. I can promise you this, freethinking is not the answer. Enlightenment, as you so dearly hold, is nothing but an excuse to scab over the past emotions of your life that you were unable to handle. By being able to write off the past by now saying that you have the answer to life and that answer involves only being responsible to one's self is the coward's way.

No, my sick friend. You did not intend to type non-exempt, just as you screwed up the a vs. an thing and the other crap. You just simply have a problem wanting to fit in in a place where you obviously do not belong. A place of real men with real lives who do not have to make stuff up to try to brown-nose there way into asking for acceptance from others as you have. You could have avoided all of this by simply being a man. Not lying and accepting when you were wrong. You have argued that the dictionary is wrong and you are right, tried to cover up your stupidity by later saying you meant to do it all the while, all here sees right through you and laugh, laugh.... oh how they are laughing at you.

Let me be so bold to explain enlightenment to you. Enlightenment entails learning, something you have not done. It involves knowledge, something you have shown no hint of. Worst of all enlightenment combines both the good and the bad. You see, to see all, you have to be able to see the absolute worst life can provide as well as see the best. That is enlightenment. Feeble-minded excuse-seekers such as you can't handle the truth and can't live with the knowledge of the bad things in life.

You read a couple of books and quote from others, how about trying something original, your own thought. How about thinking for yourself instead of listening to someone else on how your are supposed to think. Can't do that can you. It's because the world needs balance. It needs buffoons like you to balance out for the true able-minded people that is most representative here.

How's that for context of "non-identification" smart-ass.

[tower]

No, PARAGON is quite correct. If they were really spelled that way, they would be vowel-type sounds. Unlike you, I'm not suggesting you need Special ED, only second grade grammar.

Did you really think that by omitting information you would make you point?

"A" goes before all words that begin with consonants.
· a cat
· a dog
· a purple onion
· a buffalo
· a big apple
with one exception: Use an before unsounded h.
· an honorable peace
· an honest error
"An" goes before all words that begin with vowels:
· an apricot
· an egg
· an Indian
· an orbit
· an uprising
with two exceptions: When u makes the same sound as the y in you, or o makes the same sound as w in won, then a is used.
· a union
· a united front
· a unicorn
· a used napkin
· a U.S. ship
· a one-legged man
Note: The choice of article is actually based upon the phonetic (sound) quality of the first letter in a word, not on the orthographic (written) representation of the letter. If the first letter makes a vowel-type sound, you use "an"; if the first letter would makes a consonant-type sound, you use "a." So, if you consider the rule from a phonetic perspective, there aren't any exceptions. Since the 'h' hasn't any phonetic representation, no audible sound, in the first exception, the sound that follows the article is a vowel; consequently, 'an' is used. In the second exception, the word-initial 'y' sound (unicorn) is actually a glide [j] phonetically, which has consonantal properties; consequently, it is treated as a consonant, requiring 'a'.
Either you are operating under the misunderstanding that the “e” in esoteric is silent, or you are misapplying your own rule. You are mistaking the sound of the letter "S" (a consonant-type sound requiring a; example at the beginning of the word stop) for the sound of the "NAME of the letter 'S', which has the sound 'ess'" as in essence or esoteric (a vowel-type sound requiring “an”). You would no more say "a esoteric concept" than you would "an stop sign."

But I'm really not about arguing syntax here; my point was that it is arrogant to call you own thought esoteric. It makes you sound as if you think the concepts that you are imparting are above most other people’s ability to comprehend. I couldn't agree with you less. I voiced my opinion. I believe James understood it, but suspect he disagrees. I respect that. It’s his choice to make. In the scheme of things, I value my own opinion no more than anyone else’s. Why would you try to set your ideas above those of others by calling them esoteric? I found nothing in you comments here that were difficult to understand. Certainly nothing that qualifies (using your definition) as principles which are above man-made ideas.

[Andy C]

Eloquently put Tower.

Personally I would have told him to go f@#k himself - but I am Scottish and a little more straight forward.

[Hart1]

Hey Tower:

You left out #1. Why?

Your 100% negative take on these important, proven, powerful points is only what can really come out of you, at this time. I understand.

Thank you for teaching me what kind of a person you really are. Your insults, false claims, and false statements really show how you deal with issues, life and others in your life. And I am sure it shows, too. Good luck.

With regret, trying to reason any further with you is like trying to give medicine to a dead man. A waste of time and effort.

From a calm beholder of life---

Hart

[funpilot]

I think you will win on firing for cause.....