Hummer Forums by Elcova  
Forums - Home
Source Decals

Source Motors
Custom. Accessories.

H2 Accessories
H3 Accessories
Other Vehicles

H2 Source

H2 Member Photos
H2 Owners Map
H2 Classifieds
H2 Photo Gallery
SUT Photo Gallery
H2 Details

H2 Club

Chapters
Application

H3 Source

H3 Member Photos
H3 Classifieds
H3 Photo Gallery
H3 Owners Map
H3 Details
H3T Concept

H1 Source

H1 Member Photos
H1 Classifieds
H1 Photo Gallery
H1 Details

General Info

Hummer Dealers
Contact
Advertise

Sponsored Ads










 


Source Motors - custom. accessories.


Go Back   Hummer Forums by Elcova > General Hummer Talk > In the News

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-25-2006, 05:32 PM
Klaus's Avatar
Klaus Klaus is offline
Hummer Guru
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: CSA
Posts: 2,511
Klaus is an unknown quantity at this point
Default General Motors Death Watch 76: Last Man Standing

General Motors Death Watch 76: Last Man Standing

25 May 2006
By Andrew Dederer






When Bob Lutz launched the new-ish Chevrolet Tahoe, the GM Car Czar claimed that the SUV and its platform partners would sell to a core group of customers who need (or at least desperately want) the size, power and towing abilities of a traditional American truck. At the same time, Lutz acknowledged that overall SUV's sales were shrinking. Unfortunately, the press neglected to explore the corollary: GM's ability to maintain SUV profits now depends on conquest sales from existing owners. Never mind the Dai-san (Toyota, Honda, Nissan) or the ?Crisis? Corporation. There?s only one way GM can generate life-sustaining lift from this profit-rich segment: hit the weak man. Ford is Job One.

In fact, GM and Ford are locked in a Detroit Death Match. Both companies? finances are in tatters. Their market shares are shrinking. Layoffs and closings are spreading throughout their respective empires. A Delphi strike threatens to shutter their assembly lines. Impossible pension and health care costs are eating into profits. They pay thousands of workers not to work. The unions can?t or won?t play ball. There?s not enough money to invest in new products. Their dealer networks are bloated. Ailing brands are dragging them down, but they can't afford to cut the deadwood. It?s like the old joke about the man fleeing a bear who nearly trips over his companion, who?s putting on a pair of running shoes. ?Are you crazy?? he yells. ?You can?t outrun a bear!? ?I don?t have to outrun the bear,? his former friend replies. ?I just have to outrun you.?

Ever since The General's bankruptcy stopped being a paranoid fantasy, GM CEO Rick Wagoner has insisted that Chapter 11 is not on the horizon, or even in play. While GM could use Chapter 11 to cut pay, pensions, health care, brands and dealers, Wagoner claims the move would fatally damage GM customers? trust (such as it is). But, if Ford went to the wall first, broke the UAW?s back in court and jettisoned its excess dealers, GM could demand the same treatment from the unions and the courts. GM would enjoy most of the benefits of ?re-alignment? without damaging its reputation AND scoop-up market share from its prostrate rival.

Seen though this lens, it?s possible that Rick Wagoner?s otherwise inexplicable ?steady as she goes? strategy reflects a deeper understanding that GM is fighting a war of attrition against its cross-town rival. If so, the sides are evenly matched. Ford has a better pickup, arguably a better car line and better foreign brands (all solid except for ailing, arthritic Jaguar). GM has better SUVs, a more robust luxury line and sheer size. At the end of the proverbial day, these two automaking giants are in such similar straits that Ford (and to some extent Chrysler) feels obliged to equal or better every GM incentive, discount and sales gimmick. Employee discounts, gas cards, zero per cent financing, cash back-- the hits to the bottom line keep happening.

Of course, these incentive wars are a dangerous game of ?chicken? for both companies. The endless discounting has not only damaged all hope of profitability, it?s dragged GM and Ford deep into discount car company territory, shattering their once-proud reputations for high-quality products. What?s more, the campaigns are only working relative to each other; while GM and Ford (and Chrysler) fight each other over scraps, Dai San continues their slow, inexorable increase in overall US market share. The rot may become so bad that neither company could find their way back-- even after bankruptcy levels the playing field.

Besides, the ?what?s good for the goose is good for the gander? principle has no basis in law. Who?s to say a Ford Chapter 11 would force the all-powerful labor unions to be more conciliatory towards GM when their contracts come up for renewal in ?07? Why would the myriad of state courts involved in dealership agreements allow a solvent GM to dump its dealers just because a federal bankruptcy judge bestowed this advantage upon a stricken FoMoCo?

If Wagoner and his team are thinking Who Laughs Last, they may have it exactly backwards. The first domestic carmaker to file for bankruptcy could well be the first company to fully recover. Ford as much as admitted this when its quarterly statement listed GM?s bankruptcy as a potential competitive threat. So why hasn?t either company simply bitten the bullet and filed first? As always, it?s about character. Rick Wagoner sees himself as GM?s savior. He doesn?t want to be the captain who went down with the ship. Billy Ford feels the same way. But events (and their own incompetence) are conspiring against them. Sooner or later, both men are bound to learn that pride goeth before a fall.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin Version 3.0.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.