Hummer Forums by Elcova  
Forums - Home
Source Decals

Source Motors
Custom. Accessories.

H2 Accessories
H3 Accessories
Other Vehicles

H2 Source

H2 Member Photos
H2 Owners Map
H2 Classifieds
H2 Photo Gallery
SUT Photo Gallery
H2 Details

H2 Club

Chapters
Application

H3 Source

H3 Member Photos
H3 Classifieds
H3 Photo Gallery
H3 Owners Map
H3 Details
H3T Concept

H1 Source

H1 Member Photos
H1 Classifieds
H1 Photo Gallery
H1 Details

General Info

Hummer Dealers
Contact
Advertise

Sponsored Ads










 


Source Motors - custom. accessories.


Go Back   Hummer Forums by Elcova > General Hummer Talk > In the News

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-01-2006, 12:12 PM
Klaus's Avatar
Klaus Klaus is offline
Hummer Guru
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: CSA
Posts: 2,511
Klaus is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Hybrids Consume More Energy in Lifetime Than Chevrolet's Tahoe SUV

BANDON, Ore., March 31 -- As Americans become increasingly interested in fuel economy and global warming, they are beginning to make choices about the vehicles they drive based on fuel economy and to a lesser degree emissions.

But many of those choices aren't actually the best in terms of vehicle lifetime energy usage and the cost to society over the full lifetime of a car or truck.

CNW Marketing Research Inc. spent two years collecting data on the energy necessary to plan, build, sell, drive and dispose of a vehicle from initial concept to scrappage. This includes such minutia as plant to dealer fuel costs, employee driving distances, electricity usage per pound of material used in each vehicle and literally hundreds of other variables.

To put the data into understandable terms for consumers, it was translated into a "dollars per lifetime mile" figure. That is, the Energy Cost per mile driven.

The most Energy Expensive vehicle sold in the U.S. in calendar year 2005: Maybach at $11.58 per mile. The least expensive: Scion xB at $0.48 cents.

While neither of those figures is surprising, it is interesting that driving a hybrid vehicle costs more in terms of overall energy consumed than comparable non-hybrid vehicles.

For example, the Honda Accord Hybrid has an Energy Cost per Mile of $3.29 while the conventional Honda Accord is $2.18. Put simply, over the "Dust to Dust" lifetime of the Accord Hybrid, it will require about 50 percent more energy than the non-hybrid version.

One of the reasons hybrids cost more than non-hybrids is the manufacture, replacement and disposal of such items as batteries, electric motors (in addition to the conventional engine), lighter weight materials and complexity of the power package.

And while many consumers and environmentalists have targeted sport utility vehicles because of their lower fuel economy and/or perceived inefficiency as a means of transportation, the energy cost per mile shows at least some of that disdain is misplaced.

For example, while the industry average of all vehicles sold in the U.S. in 2005 was $2.28 cents per mile, the Hummer H3 (among most SUVs) was only $1.949 cents per mile. That figure is also lower than all currently offered hybrids and Honda Civic at $2.42 per mile.

"If a consumer is concerned about fuel economy because of family budgets or depleting oil supplies, it is perfectly logical to consider buying high- fuel-economy vehicles," says Art Spinella, president of CNW Marketing Research, Inc. "But if the concern is the broader issues such as environmental impact of energy usage, some high-mileage vehicles actually cost society more than conventional or even larger models over their lifetime.

"We believe this kind of data is important in a consumer's selection of transportation," says Spinella. "Basing purchase decisions solely on fuel economy or vehicle size does not get to the heart of the energy usage issue."

The goal of overall worldwide energy conservation and the cost to society in general -- not just the auto buyer -- can often be better addressed by being aware of a car or truck's "dust to dust" energy requirements, he said.

This study is not the end of the energy-usage discussion. "We hope to see a dialog begin that puts educated and aware consumers into energy policy decisions," Spinella said. "We undertook this research to see if perceptions (about energy efficiency) were true in the real world."
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-01-2006, 02:16 PM
HummBebe HummBebe is offline
Hummer Guru
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: nonpiker
Posts: 5,900
HummBebe is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

I love it when people look at the REAL truth. Overall that is a great article. Reminds me of the pros and cons to nuclear power
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-01-2006, 09:46 PM
Steve - SanJose
 
Posts: n/a
Default

No free lunches for sure.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-03-2006, 09:41 PM
hmrlvr's Avatar
hmrlvr hmrlvr is offline
Hummer Authority
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: On the Beach or at the River
Posts: 1,204
hmrlvr is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Here's my take: The study's authors are right in the frame of the way they are measuring cost. However, it's important to note that the hybrids cost more over a life-time of energy usage because they are relatively new technology. The traditional internal combustion engine, as an established technology, is much cheaper to manufacture, market and dispose of. As hyprid technologies evolve, the cost will come down, as will the energy required to build them.

More to the point, for the last two years, and for the first time ever, oil and gas exploration companies have found less new reserves then the amount they refined and sold. The oil is running out. It may take a 100 years, but those last 50 will be ugly unless we invest in new technologies now and make them cheaper down the road.

But it's all food for thought.
__________________
WWW.BCBI.COM
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-04-2006, 12:40 AM
NEOCON1's Avatar
NEOCON1 NEOCON1 is offline
Hummer Guru
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: rollin with Beebs & F5
Posts: 5,546
NEOCON1 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

someone please forward to robert kennedy jr. and arianna huffington i am sick of those two cool-aid drinkers
__________________
GREEN no BLING , LINE-X & 35's , Adv. , monsoon & some other crap too
Hangin with my HOABies , Bling is cool but HOABies RULE!!!!
Black Sheep Hummer Squadron / camp no due's & no dont's
* Rollin with the Banned and the Damned *

"Fred Thompson for President "
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:34 AM.


Powered by vBulletin Version 3.0.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.