Any Accountants Out There??? [Archive] - Hummer Forums by Elcova

SONA

12-19-2002, 10:50 AM

Since I am using mine to drive 95% for business (LOL) we are claiming the deduction. I have a number of friends who have done this sucessfully, first you need to be in a contracting or independent business owner to do it, i.e. get MISC 1099 as your source of income if you work for others, or totally be independent. For example I have a job that I get a W2 but also do independent contract work as well. You can not do it if you work for someone else and get only the normal old W2. As long as the purchase is made in the year of the deduction, up to 31 Dec 2002. It is a tax loop hole. That is why lots of high dollar earners have Suburbans and Tahoes or big pick ups. Most of the vehicles like this are eligible. We have looked VERY closely at this deduction and reviewed it with our accounting firm, the result being it is totally deductable and legal. The remaining cost is depreciated over the next 5 years. So it is 24 or 25 grand off the tax owed. I must admit, this fact was a major decision factor for our purchase of the H2.

"Let me show you my gun collection"

Rickster

12-19-2002, 11:12 AM

Thanks Sona. I spoke to my accountant and he basically said the same thing. Since I'm a commercial real estate broker (independent contractor) I would qualify.

This is great. Isn't it great to be an American and for Uncle Sam to subsidize our toys.. /infopop/emoticons/icon_smile.gif

Texas Red

12-19-2002, 12:08 PM

Here's another thought for those of us who have to finance and pay out the H2.

Take out a home equity loan to pay off the H2. Interest rate for the equity loan should be about the same and the interest in most cases is tax deductible.

At least this is what I heard. I haven't checked it out yet for my location.

Jim
Red H2 in Texas

KAC

12-19-2002, 01:19 PM

<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote">quote:<HR>Originally posted by Texas Red:
Take out a home equity loan to pay off the H2. Interest rate for the equity loan should be about the same and the interest in most cases is tax deductible.
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

Another option is to do a refinance with a cash out option. The interest rate is lower than I could have gotten for a car loan plus it's tax deductible. And, if you increase your payments to 'pay off' the truck in 5 years, you get the added bonus of paying off your mortgage early. So, after a refinance, I'm paying the same I was paying for my house payment and MDX, knocked 5 years off the original loan and, can knock another 3 1/2 yrs off the mortgage. All of this made the H2 a bargain! And, I have the title.

Kim

KAC
'03 Red Adv Series

H2Norcal

12-19-2002, 02:08 PM

This is the only reason it makes sense for me to buy one....I currently have a Sierra HD 2500 with the 6.0 Vortec (nearly same motor as H2) as a business truck and love it. Unfortunately it has reached it maximum tax depreciation benefits. You definitely have to have a legitimate business with a position that allows you to do this and keep mileage logs or you will get hammered by Uncle Sam. I know several people that have. Fines are nasty.

I believe the tax rules state the vehicle must have a 8k Gross Vehicle Weight Rating (the vehicle weight is not relevant). The H2 qualifies. Many of the other mid-sized SUV's don't (a light duty Tahoe for instance is on the edge).

Good luck.

bklynh2srock

12-19-2002, 02:18 PM

BIG article on this topic in the Wall Street Journal today in the Personal Journal. All those interested may want to pick up a copy.

bklynh2srock

12-19-2002, 02:25 PM

Here's a link to the Detroit News article referred to in the WSJ:

[URL=http://www.detnews.com/2002/autosinsider/0212/18/c01-38875.htm]

Steve R

12-19-2002, 05:47 PM

Nobody wants to be audited...but nobody wants to give up a great deduction either. When it comes to having a vehicle used for business the IRS can be sticklers. It helps if you have a 2nd vehicle that you can claim is entirely used for personal stuff, while the "work truck" is all about work.

That's why I've kept my old car sitting around...just for back-up and to substantiate having a personal use vehicle...and even with that, it's a good idea to show the work-truck as only 80% work related anyhow. Just a thought.

SONA

12-19-2002, 09:08 PM

We keep a old volvo and my F-150 around...

"Let me show you my gun collection"

Rickster

12-20-2002, 11:24 AM

bklynh2srock -

I'm a little confused.

I thought only SUV's that weighed more than 6,000 lbs. could qualify for this deduction, yet the article lists several SUV's weighing under this that qualify??

Dan

12-20-2002, 01:12 PM

What if your small business turns out a negligible or $0 profit? I have a small business that will be starting up this coming spring but will probably not generate any revenue until 2004. The next year will be spent on product development, etc.
Is this write off beneficial for me as well, having a low/no profit business? Or does this only work if your business is very profitable??

Sorry, I'm a little new to the small business & related tax scene...

- Dan

Hummie2

12-20-2002, 01:28 PM

I think the weight issue refers to GVWR not curb weight. The vehicles listed in the article would have a GVWR of 6000 pounds. GVWR for H2 is 8600 lbs. and curb weight of 6400+lbs. Interesting to note however of the 38 listed vehicles H1 nor H2 are not mentioned in article. Journalists remember it when they want to slam it for gas mileage though!

When dealing with IRS be sure and keep a detailed log of business use verses personal use of a claimed vehicle, otherwise they might disallow a claimed deduction. We have a Venture van as part of a "S" Corp and our accountant advised us to keep the same records of vehicle use as we did before we incorporated and only claimed mileage on business use of a personal vehicle.

Don

MAC

12-20-2002, 03:08 PM

Weight is based on gross weight of 8600 Ibs.
The deduction adds to your loss, your current year loss can be carry over to future years. That is if you intend to make money in the future years.

Every tax case is different, in my case I have been audited 4 years in a roll several years back, each time last months with IRS agent stationed in a office we gave him in my bldg. completed with his own laptop. I almost thought he was my employee. The MAIN point here is that they never checked auto log or expense receipts as conventional wisdom indicated. They mainly traced money flow in and out of all accounts, origin/reason/where it went, they tried to find unreported income or cash. All cases are different. Didn't bother me that much, I always follow the laws and rules, and all turned out clean and good.

Dan

12-24-2002, 01:22 PM

What company structure would benefit more from this? Would it be more beneficial to be structured as an LLC and have the tax benefit pass through to your individual income tax? Or does this work better if your business is set up as a corporation, where the tax affects only the company, not the corporation holder?

We should have a financial forum!
- Dan

12-24-2002, 08:08 PM

Dan, As long as you own the company, the structure does not really matter. If it is a "C" corp, the corporation will pay less taxes. If it is an "S" corp, or an LLC, the bottom line income of the company will flow through to you and be taxed at your personal tax rate. Therefore, any savings to the company will also result in less taxes. Either way, you win.

It is more complicated than this, though. There are also things to consider when you sell the vehicle. In order for the transaction to be "closed out" on your books, you need to sell the vehicle at some point. If you merely trade it in, the book value is rolled over into the new vehicle and is calculated in it's cost basis. If you do sell it outright and the sale is for more than book value, you will create additional tax liability. Just be careful how you handle th whole transaction and discuss it with an accountant before hand. You won't want surprises.

SONA

12-24-2002, 09:06 PM

In fact you need neither be an LLC, S or C corp to take the deduction. Only be an independent contractor. The differnce is the rate at which tax liability is incurred, your personal rate or a corprate rate. It costs money to set up the corps LLC, S, C and they anual costs must be offset by any savings. In my case, not all of my income comes from my contracting jobs, but a good 40% does. What you use the vehicle for and the record keeping you use is more important then the corprate status you carry. If you have all of your income from contracting or business, and no other job... then you gain tax breaks by incorprating, but if not, then it is not worth it the cost and book keeping and legal fees required to incorprate.

"Let me show you my gun collection"

MAC

12-24-2002, 10:03 PM

In my case, I printed the tax codes and the news story posted on this site, I will simply hand it over to my accountant, together with all the 02 tax bundles, and he will figure out everything. I did not know about this tax issue when I bought Hummer, if nothing else, this single issue(if and when proven to be true and correct) has made my participation at this Hummer forum well worth the time and effort, not to mention the pleasure of making Hummer friends.

Based on first year tax credit of $24000 + additional first year depreciation of approx. $2000, total $26000, gas at $1.60 a gal., that is 162,500 miles of free gas, courtesy of Uncle Sam.

Or if you take the tax saved off the Hummer price, Hummer is even cheaper than those Japanese econo boxes.

x-mst.com

12-27-2002, 06:19 PM

My accountant told me that I would get the $24,000 first year, and then and extra 30% on the remainder because after Sept11, Bush added the extra 30% first year capital depreciation to stimulate spending. After that 30%, I would then get the standard $2000-$4000 deduction. All this adds up to a whopping first year depreciation of the H2!

Anyone else heard of the 30% rule?

Rory

12-27-2002, 10:05 PM

All,
I just saw a piece about this very tax break that's being discussed on the ABC national news. They even mentioned and showed a yellow H2 on a dealers lot.
Maybe some of you on the West coast can catch it still.

Rory
'94 Wagon

MAC

12-28-2002, 05:52 AM

Rory, Thanks for the advance notice. I saw the ABC News @ 530PM West Coast. Didn't fully comprehend some of the numbers in the news, such as $37K depreciation during the first year on a $47K SUV, the deal gets better and better by the day. I am running out of fingers and toes to count this tax deal. If any members have any solid B/W stories or codes(similar to post on page 1 of this subject), pleazzzee post them. Not every accountant is on top of these areas, B/W copies save everyone lots of time and debate come tax filing time.

Nancy

12-28-2002, 11:28 PM

You guys have confused this a little but bits and pieces in this thread have the correct info.

First, assume the vehicle is used for business purposes. If not used business none of this applies anyway. And it does not matter whether or not the business is incorporated, a partnership, sole proprietorship or what have you.

The "Section 179" deduction refered to is the (currently) allowed deduction for otherwise depreciable assets. This means you can expense this amount straight away instead of spreading it over a specific number of years. This applies to tangible personal property used in a trade or business, of which a car is one. Note that the deduction cannot exceed the taxable income derived from the business activity. In other words, the Section 179 deduction is the lesser of taxable income or $24,000.00

Additionally, President Bush signed into law last March, tax legislation that allows "bonus" depreciation of 30% for all qualifying assets first placed into service by the taxpayer after Sept. 11, 2001 and prior to Sept. 11, 2004.

After the above rules are exhausted, any remaining basis is depreciated over a specified period.

Above are the general rules for depreciable tangible assets used in a trade or business.

But....there is a special rule about cars. It's how the tax code tries to "soak the rich" just like with phase-outs on itemized deductions on personal returns. Cars are limited to about $3500 of depreciation a year. That's really only has an impact for high cost vehicles like Mercedes, BMWs, etc. And...it would apply to the H2 except for this little thing:

Ta da...while limiting the deduction for luxury vehicles they realized that their target would also catch farm tractors, heavy duty road equipment and the like, so the tax law says that limitation only applies to vehicles with a gross vehicle weight of LESS than 6,000 pounds. The H2 exceeds that weight so the luxury automobile depreciation limitation does not apply.

So we can do some numbers here. For simplicity, the H2 cost $60,000 to place into service. 100% business use. No other depreciable assets were bought during the year so the whole $24,000 Section 179 expense is applied to the H2. Now the basis is $36,000. Next we take the 9/11 bonus depreciation of 30% which is $10,800. After that, regular depreciation, 20% of the remainder is taken, or $6,960. This means the first year we can expense $41,760 of the car, leaving a depreciable basis of only $18,240 for future years. 40% of this you get to take in year 2.

And there you have the current tax impact of buying an H2 for business use. If your business use is less than 100% then the numbers are adjusted proportionately.

Very cool. But keep it quiet. If Congress figures this out, the jig will be up!

Nancy (CPA)

Steve R

12-29-2002, 02:51 AM

Dear Nancy....I love when you talk this way!!

In the end...we still depreciate only the difference between the cost of aquisition and the residual value when we eventually sell the thing? That and all the operating expenses?

All we are doing is accelorating the expense, right? If you figure it cost $60,000 and will be worth $18,000 in 5 years...then our depreciable base is $42,000. Normally that would be expensed as $8,400 for each of the 5 years....but instead we can take a larger amount today and have less later? In the end...it only comes down to the tax money we don't spend today we can invest and have longer?

MAC

12-29-2002, 03:16 AM

In the case of a commercial property (example: an office bldg.), when I sell it, the capital gain is sale price less depreciable base, which means the depreciation I used in the past years will be added back in, uncle Sam gets his hands on the money eventually.

If that is also true with my equipment (Hummer), if I sell it 1 year later for $50000, my gain is $50,000 - $18240 = $31,760. I sell it $10K less than I bought it, but because of the depreciation I use in the first year, I actually make $31760 taxable income on the next year‘s returns. Is this correct? And is it regular income or is it capital gains with higher tax rate?

Nancy

12-29-2002, 04:28 AM

Steve,

Yes, all you are doing is accelerating the expense. But a dollar today is worth way more than a dollar five years from now, so it's of great value.

And in the case of the H2, because of its gross vehicle weight rating, it means you will see depreciation you would pracically never seen due to the personal vehicle limitation that does not apply to the H2. The limitation of $3,000-3,500 (the number changes every year and there is also special this and that..I don't know the exact number for 2002 off the top of my head) means high cost vehicle'd depreciation is so many years out the it is beyond the life of the car. While you have the right to it in future years, you just can't get there.

There is no salvage value considered in the depreciation of a car used primarily for business us. Salvage value adjustments to basis are only used for straight-line depreciation calculations. Business use cars are depreciated using the declining balance method under MACRS (Modified Accelerated Cost Recovery System). The first and last year, the depreciation is 20% of the adjusted basis. The other years it is 40%. You can see how it works in the example I posted earlier.

Nancy

Nancy

12-29-2002, 04:39 AM

Note: before I forget, the dates for the 30% bonus depreciation is Sept. 11, 2001 through the end of 2004, not 9/11/04.

Mac,

Yes, if you sell the car, you must recapture excess depreciation. If you do not replace the car then that amount is taxed as ordinary income.

However, if you replace the car then that amount is an adjustment to the basis of the replacement car and is not included in taxable income.

Example:

Car originally cost $60,000. Depreciated basis is $30,000. Sell the car for $50,000 then there is depreciation recapture of $20,000 subject to taxation as ordinary income. But buy another car to replace it for $70,000. The depreciable basis of the replacement car is now $50,000.

Basis adjustments happen with like-kind exchanges, involuntary conversions and the like.

Nancy

Nancy

12-29-2002, 04:48 AM

Congratulate me! I finally got my husband to place his order for a 2003 H2 today! Hurrah!

He's been eyeing it since it was introduced. The man denies himself everything and the rest of the family nothing. He finally let himself do it.

Black, adventure series, wrap-around brush guard, carbon fiber dash, can't remember what else. But it's black on black on black. Just like the Suburban it's replacing. Supposed to be here in 5-6 weeks.

I've been lurking on the site for a while and really appreciate all the information so freely given here. It's been very useful. I'm a member of a similiar group for Mercedes owners and you guys are just as great as they are. Too bad my almost Luddite husband won't post on groups! I'll just have to do it for him. /infopop/emoticons/icon_razz.gif

I can't wait to get a load of what we will look like...his big black H2 next to my tiny red SLK320. Should be quite a sight!

Nancy

Hummie2

12-29-2002, 09:01 AM

Thankyou for your posts on the tax questions. Its nice to have our own resident tax consultant on the forum and I hope your H2 arrives soon. Believe me the 8wk wait on ours has been killing my wife and I, its here at trainyard but hasn't been delivered to dealer yet because holidays put deliveries behind a little. Better luck to you and your husband.

Your explanation on tax write off this year and recapture taxes in future were very understandable to me ( usually when I talk to our CPA I am totally confused ). I also have another Question on this subject. I have income from employment and my wife runs a small business out of our home. Bussiness is off this year, but thats not all bad, as 3 yrs ago (before we incorporated and corp. pays wife a salary) bussiness was good and our taxes were over 30k /infopop/emoticons/icon_eek.gif. H2 purchase won't help taxes much this year for us. While researching the "Section 179" question I read that a NOL (net operating loss) can be carried back 5yrs to previous yrs. My question is there anyway to use Sec.179 or 30% law to create a NOL this year and go back and file amended returns for previous years when business was better?

Thanks and Welcome to Forum /infopop/emoticons/icon_smile.gif

Don & Phyllis

Nancy

12-29-2002, 03:34 PM

Don,

Thanks for the compliment about being able to understand my explanations. I only hope I don't make them so simple as to obscure certain points and, on the other hand, use terms that aren't widely recognized. Example, upon re-reading my answer about recapture depreciation, I used the term like-kind exchange. Which is the term I use, but I really should have said "trade-in" to make that answer more understandable. I use like-kind because that rule applies to more than just cars. So when I say the depreciation recapture can be rolled into the basis of a replacement car, that is under the like-kind exchange rules. Which means trade-in. It occurs to me that someone might think they can private-sale the car then replace it in the same year and get that treatment. It must be a single trade-in transaction, not two distinct transactions. I hope that is more clear.

For your situation, yes, you can carry back losses. However, Section 179 in and of itself cannot create a loss since it is limited to a maximum, $24000 for 2002, or taxable income. You cannot take net income below zero with a Section 179 deduction. However, when you can't take 179 because of this you end up having a larger depreciable basis so therefore more depreciation. That depreciation DOES create a loss that can be carried back. This also applies to the 30% bonus depreciation. Just not the 179 deduction.

With limited understanding of your specific circumstances, generally if you have zero profit, you start with the 30% bonus on the car then apply the first year depreciation of 20% to the remaining, creating a loss that can be carried back.

If you do not place the car into service by this Tuesday (assuming the corporation has a December 31 year-end), and it sounds like you won't be able to since it's still sitting in the railyard, you will do this for the 2003 tax year.

Nancy

MAC

12-29-2002, 03:50 PM

Nancy, thanks for the help. Surprised to see "like-Kind exchange" for vehicles, I have dealt with 1031 in commercial properties and in legal cases, but did not know about cars. I have more questions, but I will not take advantage of you and will refrain from asking any further questions.

I love your description: "The man denies himself everything and the rest of the family nothing." Not exactly myself, but I will save it and see if I can use it one of these days, sounds very nice and elegant. It will come in handy when I want something I shouldn’t buy down the road.

"The man denies himself everything and the rest of the family nothing." Boys and gals, write that down.

Steve R

12-29-2002, 05:53 PM

...but are you an accountant?????

Nance...thanks for an excellent and thorough explanation. I myself am a contractor and being self-employed intend to take full advantage of the tax benefits available. Congrats on the H2 purchase...I'm quite certain you'll find the H2 being likew no other vehicle you've ever owned!

Hummie2

12-29-2002, 08:40 PM

You have outdone yourself one more time. If you ever decide to start an online consulting service you can certainly pick up several customers here on this forum.

Be sure an post plenty of pictures of your H2 when you get it. We all love seeing another Hummer.

If you ever have any tech or mechanical questions please feel free to ask. I will do my best to answer as clearly as you have. If I can't, Steve R or one of the others always come to the rescue with a great answer.

Super nice people here.

Don

Nancy

12-30-2002, 12:42 AM

Mac,

Yes, like-kind exchange rules apply to personal property as well as real property. It's so straight forward and simple with personal property that you probably have been doing it and haven't given it much thought that it was just that.

Personal property (and for those reading this who may not know, when I say personal property, I mean tangible property use in a trade or business and not personal use property) gets the deferred treatment when it is like-class, which mean they fall under the same General Asset Class or Product Class. Cars are obviously like-class. But you can also trade a computer for a printer and defer any depreciation recapture also since they are in the same "general asset class". But you could not do it when trading a car for say, an airplane, because, even though they are both modes of transportation they are not in the same asset class. Like-kind and like-class are treated the same.

You are probably more aware of the 1031 like-kind exchange rules for real estate and legal cases because those transactions are more of a to-do due to the nature and value of the assets involved. The Starker Ruling exchange provisions (3+ way exchanges) are commonly seen in real estate transactions, although these rules can be invoked for personal property transactions too. Personal property is just usually a lesser deal than real property so people might not be aware they are sometimes effectively doing the same thing under tax law.

Nancy

bklynh2srock

12-30-2002, 12:51 AM

Thanks, congrats and welcome all wrapped up in one!

Your descriptions have made it possible for even my law school-addled brain to understand. I still have nightmares about FedTax.

Nancy

12-30-2002, 01:10 AM

Steve,

Yeah, I'm an accountant too. Boring, huh? LOL

Even though I am an accountant, I don't do taxes. I hate them. I have a very deep and very narrow specialty to which I limit my area of practice. A couple sections of the tax code effect it and that's it.

I don't even do work on my own return. The entire U.S. Tax Code really p**sses me off, so I just stay away from tax prep. When you really get down in to it, and understand just what they are doing to people, it will infuriate you. If you just see the end result of how much you pay in taxes, you are riled enough. See how it got there and you'd really get p.o.'d. My blood pressure is 95 over 60 and I keep it that way by not preparing tax returns of any type. Ever. /infopop/emoticons/icon_smile.gif

But I do keep up with the changes in the law. The general provisions such as this depreciation/179 discussion are pretty straight forward in their generalities. We have some people in our office who are incredibly good at this stuff so I can't help but keep up, almost by osmosis. My husband is also a CPA and I guess we have a very weird office. Everyone in it has some unique and extreme expertise in some area of something. We are not a large practice and all know a lot about each others expertise just by being exposed to it daily.

I can't tell you how often I am jaw-droppingly surprised that all CPAs, or at least those not in giant national firms, don't know or can't explain this stuff, even when they don't work in taxes every day just like I don't. Perhaps our firm is just the Hummer H2 of the accounting world. /infopop/emoticons/icon_razz.gif We're different that way.

As you might be able to see from my prior post to Mac, there is not one simple answer to even a simple question. While generally the deferral of depreciation recapture on an automobile requires a trade-in transaction, there are actually ways to structure a deal so you can indeed tranfer it to a third party other than a dealer, buy a new car from a dealer and still have a roll-over adjustment to the basis in the new car instead of recognizing the depreciation recapture as ordinary income. It's usually not worth the expense and trouble since the difference can be negligible, but it can be done.

So even small questions require very big answers since every situation is different and there is often several correct answers, any one of which is better in a given situtation. Always seek competent tax advice for your own specific circumstances.

Nancy

Nancy

12-30-2002, 01:17 AM

Don,

Thanks for the welcome. This is such a friendly group, I will not hesitate to take you up on your offer to pepper you with questions.

Honestly though, I am amazed I found so many answers already during my lurking days. Even though the members don't agree on certain options and such, the debate was so well presented it was really easy to weigh the arguments and make a decision of which way to go on certain things with the H2 order.

Nancy

MAC

12-30-2002, 01:34 AM

These are always a part of my conversation with accountants on personal or business tax issues:
No you can't. Yes, we can. No you can't. Yes we have.
No you can't. But we have. No you can't. But I read it in.....
on and on and on. In the end everyone is happy and confused.

Your specialist practice is common in professional field, that is the norm among attornys, accountants and doctors; specialist is where the money is, not general practice. In some legal cases we had to go through 10+ lawyers from different firms, working together or pass onto another firm for different stage of legal works, seek out 2nd opinion or more aggressive alternatives.

Nancy

12-30-2002, 01:46 AM

Mac,

And at least 90% of the time, "yes you can" is the right answer. Just have to know some obsure provision not commonly known or structure something in a different way that gets to the same end-result but has a different tax impact. The other 10$ of the time it's uninformed or idiot advice and you're lucky if you don't get thrown in jail thanks to the moron!

I think specialization is more common in the legal and medical professions than accounting but it is certainly there also. What's more unusual about me is not that I have a speciality, but what that speciality is. Very narrow indeed.

Good luck with your tax-effect on your new Hummer!

Nancy

Steve R

12-30-2002, 04:02 AM

Dear Nancy (catchy name for an 'ask' forum)

Thanks again for the concise info....just to show my appreciation AND respect for you, we will forgo the typical initiation/induction to our forum and (what the heck) even waive the required picture of you in a bikini that is requisite for new members. /infopop/emoticons/icon_wink.gif /infopop/emoticons/icon_biggrin.gif

Course, we stopped the bikini-pic requirement after Heehaw sent in his pic of such. sheesh: that pic warped my fragile little mind. /infopop/emoticons/icon_eek.gif /infopop/emoticons/icon_eek.gif /infopop/emoticons/icon_eek.gif

Vaka Humm

12-30-2002, 12:32 PM

Nancy, thank you for all the info. I just spoke to my CPA and because of you I'll save a ton-o-green!! Next time you and yours are field testing the new H2 in the Tampa area let me know and dinner is on me. This is a great forum due to folks like you that freely exchange ideas and information with all of us. Thanks again. BTW where is your firm located? Van

Nancy

12-31-2002, 10:25 AM

<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote">quote:<HR>Originally posted by Vaka Humm:
Nancy, thank you for all the info. I just spoke to my CPA and because of you I'll save a ton-o-green!! Next time you and yours are field testing the new H2 in the Tampa area let me know and dinner is on me. This is a great forum due to folks like you that freely exchange ideas and information with all of us. Thanks again. BTW where is your firm located? Van<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

Van,

Glad to have been of help. As I posted before, I despise the US tax system so I get no greater thrill than when helping people use it (legally) to their advantage.

In the small world department, me and mine LIVE in Tampa. Our accounting firm is right outside the downtown area. How's that for coincidence?

We are often in Boca Grande..have dear friends who have a place there. So you may just have to come through on that dinner. http://www.elcova.com/infopop/emoticons/icon_razz.gif The Temptation is my all time favorite restaurant. It definately has the best fried soft shell crabs in the world. No matter where we go, when we order soft shells, we always compare them to the Temp's. As of yet, none have measured up.

Enjoy paradise down there. And do start the year with a Boodles and tonic in the bar at the Temp for me.

Hmmm...I wonder if we already know each other?

Nancy
p.s. Say hello to Buck. He's down there now.

MAC

12-31-2002, 03:34 PM

Great! Nancy, The Temptation, I'll remember that, love hard to find soft shell crab. We will be in Tempa mid April on business at Marriott Waterside. Never been in Tempa. I spent hours on the web searching for some neat small hotel, instead of usual concrete block big hotel, but not knowing what is what and where is where, I gave up. On last trip to San Antonio, I found the Menger next to Alamo, that was a lot more fun than Hyatt. Will the taxi know about The Temptation?

Nancy

12-31-2002, 05:06 PM

Mac,

Boca Grande is almost two hours south of Tampa. You definately do not want to go by taxi.

If you like fishing, Boca is THE place for it so you may want to get a rental car and spend some time there. The Gasparilla Inn is where you should book for a stay down there.

The Marriott Waterside is quite nice even if it is a larger hotel. I can't really think of any small, quaint hotels in town.

I can give you some Tampa restaurant recommendations. As April approaches, let me know what your preferences are and I will send you a list.

Nancy

Vaka Humm

12-31-2002, 07:27 PM

Nancy, I haven't been to that restaurant but it sound great lets set it up. email me at vakatwo@yahoo.com I get down there about every weekend but I'll be there for ALL of Tarpon season, April, May and June http://www.elcova.com/infopop/emoticons/icon_biggrin.gif. Maybe when Mac is down we can get togeather.
Mac, if you have time it would be worth it to come a little south of Tampa and visit some of the last unspoiled part of Florida on the west coast, not only Boca but also a little village of Punta Gorda (thats where my vacation house is that is going through some remodling)
PS Nancy do you and yours do the Tarpon thing in the pass??
When we are in Tampa we like to go for sushi at the Crazy Buffet, been yet?

Vaka Humm

12-31-2002, 07:35 PM

Mac if you like "old world style" try the Bellview Biltmore in Bellair Beach near Clearwater.
http://www.belleviewbiltmore.com/
It is the oldest wooden stucture in Florida and very classy, with a great golf corse. Are you comming for grins or biz?

MAC

12-31-2002, 09:36 PM

Van and Nancy, Thanks for tips. The Belleview looks great and the rates are cheap compared to downtown Tampa, how far it is from downtown Tampa? driving time-wise. The map for that area has very complicated coastlines with 3 cities, Tampa, Clearwater and St.Petersburg, I did not know that. Glad I asked, instead of just jump into a Tempa taxi "The Temptation, please." only to have the taxi driver find out I am the famous Hummer idiot. It will be a business trip with details to come later. Thanks very much for the hospitality, great people on a great forum. I think we will rent a car and drive around aimlessly all over the place. If we can find a place to rent a speedboat, that will be even better, we did that in Miami Beach. We always try to go on biz trips together, that way the most boring places can be just as exciting.

Vaka Humm

01-01-2003, 11:07 AM

Mac, it's about 30-45 mins to downtown Tampa from the Builtmore but an easy drive. Yes rent a car and explore, there is a place that even rents Harlys, Porch, Jag, Ferari Vipers etc. The Builtmore is close to all beaches, St Pete and Clearwater. As for a boats, there is all kinds of boating here, ask at the Builtmore for recomendations.

Nancy

01-01-2003, 02:46 PM

Mac,

The Biltmore is a 45 minute drive and the traffic is sometimes horrible over the Causeway. Stay at the Marriott Waterside for the business portion of your trip and then go over to Clearwater for some play days. While the Biltmore would be a good choice, ultimate play days should be spent at the Don Cesar on St. Pete Beach or at the Gasparilla Inn in Boca Grande, in my not-so-humble opinion.

If you are bringing your wife also, there are some interesting things for her to do that are easy to get to from the Marriott. She can go to Channelside and Harbour Island by foot. Ybor City, Tampa's poor but still fun attempt at duplicating New Orlean's French Quarter, is very close by with easy transportation to/from the Marriott.

Nancy

Nancy

01-01-2003, 02:47 PM

<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote">quote:<HR>Originally posted by Vaka Humm:
Nancy, I haven't been to that restaurant but it sound great lets set it up. email me at vakatwo@yahoo.com I get down there about every weekend but I'll be there for ALL of Tarpon season, April, May and June http://www.elcova.com/infopop/emoticons/icon_biggrin.gif. Maybe when Mac is down we can get togeather.
Mac, if you have time it would be worth it to come a little south of Tampa and visit some of the last unspoiled part of Florida on the west coast, not only Boca but also a little village of Punta Gorda (thats where my vacation house is that is going through some remodling)
PS Nancy do you and yours do the Tarpon thing in the pass??
When we are in Tampa we like to go for sushi at the Crazy Buffet, been yet?<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

Van,

What is Boca except about fishing in the pass?!? Love it.

I've never been to the Crazy Buffet. I am one of those typical south Tampa people they talk about who rarely travels north of Kennedy. Besides, I'm not keen on raw fish. http://www.elcova.com/infopop/emoticons/icon_eek.gif

Make a point of going to the Temptation on Boca. It sometimes feels like the whole island is there every night. I had erroneously thought you were on the island so I guess you didn't get my references to Boodles gin and other things. Sorry about that. I wasn't even thinking about Punta Gorda, Useppa or other places right there at Charlotte Harbor. If you do go to the Temptation, have them explain the Boodles gin connection. They have some great stories about this little restaurant.

Let's explore an H2 meet when Mac is in town. Could be fun.

Nancy

[This message was edited by Nancy on January 01, 2003 at 08:56 AM.]

Steve R

01-02-2003, 12:20 AM

Anybody wanna join me for Taco Bell?

You guys crack me up!! The Hummer H2 forum convienes to discuss the finer details of geography and fine dining.

MAC, I'm sure you've answered this before, but would you mind sharing (once again?

Steve R

01-02-2003, 12:21 AM

MAC (as I was typing)...would you mind sharing with us what it is that you do for a living? Just curious

Nancy

01-02-2003, 12:28 AM

Busted!

Sorry for going off topic. Puhleeeeze don't report me. I'm new here and don't need to start out with a ticket this soon.

MAC

01-02-2003, 12:35 AM

Steve, I just found out this little note pad on top of your own last post, when I click on it I can correct my last post. That would be nice in real life if i can rewind and unsaid a few things.

What I do is whenever any fast food joints run out of hamburger paddies, I run into the nearest phone booth to change and fly out there with fresh supply.

Dan

01-03-2003, 05:43 PM

Thanks for the info everyone, it's most helpful. I haven't got an answer on my question of this affecting or usefulness with a new business. I will be starting a new business this spring & probably won't see any profit this year. The year will be spent mostly finalizing the product, drumming up clients, etc.

So given that, is this tax break still beneficial to me?

Thanks again,
- Dan

---------------------------------
SUT on order - 18 months to go!
---------------------------------

Nancy

01-03-2003, 11:57 PM

<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote">quote:<HR>Originally posted by Dan:
Thanks for the info everyone, it's most helpful. I haven't got an answer on my question of this affecting or usefulness with a new business. I will be starting a new business this spring & probably won't see any profit this year. The year will be spent mostly finalizing the product, drumming up clients, etc.

So given that, is this tax break still beneficial to me?

Thanks again,
- Dan

---------------------------------
SUT on order - 18 months to go!
---------------------------------<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

In addition to carrying back losses, you can carrying them forward. So, yeah, it should be beneficial to you too once you place it into to service for business purposes.

Nancy

mambodoc

01-05-2003, 03:49 AM

I haven't purchased an H2 yet but I saw mentioned the a BMW X5 would qualify?...Any truth in this? Thanks.

HUMMERDOGG

01-05-2003, 04:56 AM

Nancy

01-05-2003, 07:56 PM

<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote">quote:<HR>Originally posted by mambodoc:
I haven't purchased an H2 yet but I saw mentioned the a BMW X5 would qualify?...Any truth in this? Thanks.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

Yes.

The Gross Vehicle Weight Rating of the X5 exceeds 6,000 pounds. Look inside your door jamb and you will see the exact GVWR of your X5.

Of course, you have to be eligible for the deductions in the first place. If you are, the X5 purchase will enjoy the same tax benefits as the H2.

Nancy

"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -Benjamin Franklin, 1759

HUMMERDOGG

01-06-2003, 12:33 AM

Nancy-

I thought I read where the X5 was only 4800. However, I could be wrong, being that I was really drunk last nite when I was responding to posts... http://www.elcova.com/infopop/emoticons/icon_wink.gif

-HUMMERDOGG

HUMMERDOGG

01-06-2003, 12:37 AM

OOPS, just looked it up and it seems the X5 just gets by with a GVWR of 6000... "Hair of your chinny chin, chin..."

GVWR are listed below at this link:

http://www.gonecamping.net/stories/tow_ratings.html

Sorry mambodoc for leading you astray. Hopefully this tax deduction doesn't influence your decision between H2 and X5...

Nancy

01-06-2003, 02:02 PM

<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote">quote:<HR>Originally posted by HUMMERDOGG:
Nancy-

I thought I read where the X5 was only 4800. However, I could be wrong, being that I was really drunk last nite when I was responding to posts... http://www.elcova.com/infopop/emoticons/icon_wink.gif

-HUMMERDOGG<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

LOL! Friends don't let friends give tax advice when drinking. http://www.elcova.com/infopop/emoticons/icon_biggrin.gif

I think the X5 is a few hundred pounds over the required 6,000.

Nancy

"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -Benjamin Franklin, 1759

Nancy

01-06-2003, 02:43 PM

<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote">quote:<HR>Originally posted by HUMMERDOGG:
OOPS, just looked it up and it seems the X5 just gets by with a GVWR of 6000... "Hair of your chinny chin, chin..."

GVWR are listed below at this link:

http://www.gonecamping.net/stories/tow_ratings.html

Sorry mambodoc for leading you astray. Hopefully this tax deduction doesn't influence your decision between H2 and X5...<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

Those weights listed on GoneCamping are tow limits, not Gross Vehicle Weight Ratings. Two different things I thought. GVRW is roughly the curb weight (empty vehicle except for fuel) plus payload/cargo weight. But the site is not clear. Looking at the right side, they indicate they are listing GVWR. The list itself looks like tow limits. Are they in fact the same thing? I don't think so, but if the are, then the info is inaccurate, at least for the X5.

I thought the X5 GVWR was around 6,400. A woman who works for me has a BMW X5 4.4i. We just looked inside her door jamb and, sure enough, the GVWR is 6,405. It may vary slightly for the model above and the model below the 4.4i (or not vary at all) but it definately is NOT 6,000 as listed on gonecamping.net.

If the X5 was exactly 6,000 pounds it would not qualify since the GVWR must be in excess of 6,000 pounds, not 6,000 pounds or more.

Nancy

"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -Benjamin Franklin, 1759

HUMMERDOGG

01-07-2003, 02:07 AM

I give up then... and to think that I thought everything I read on the internet was the truth... http://www.elcova.com/infopop/emoticons/icon_biggrin.gif

kelleymac2000

01-07-2003, 02:11 AM

teach you Dogg.
http://www.elcova.com/infopop/emoticons/icon_biggrin.gif
Kelley

Dennis

01-09-2003, 12:19 PM

Does anyone (Nancy?) know if the 179 depreciation applies if you file a 2106 (outside sales expense) form? I've used both the standard mileage rate and actual expense method on this form over the years and would love to be able to use the accelerated depreciation of the H2 even though my business related mileage is less than 50% of the total?
---Delivery NEXT WEEK!!!

-Dennis

Nancy

01-09-2003, 08:38 PM

If you are asking what I think you are asking, the answer is yes, there are provisions for the Section 179 deduction and 30% bonus depreciation using Form 2106, as well as taking accelerated depreciation.

When you say accelerated deprecation, do you mean the Section 179 expense deduction and the bonus 30% depreciation? If so, I'd like to clarify some terminology first.

Accelerated depreciation the the declining balance method I posted about earlier in this thread. That's the MACRS thing: Modified Accelerated Cost Recovery System. The Section 179 deduction and the 30% bonus depreciation are distinct things from that. So you have three things:

1. Depreciation which can be accelerated with the declining balance method or can be straight-line depreciation. Note that if you use the standard mileage rate you are automatically deemed to have not elected to use MACRS.

2. The Section 179 deducution for expensing straight away certain otherwise depreciable assets.

3. The new bonus 30% depreciation.

You're biggest issue is that to take the Section 179 deduction and the 30% bonus depreciation on a vehicle, it must be used more than 50% for business use.

However, what I am unsure of is this:

So-called scheduled property has the limitation that unless it is used more than 50% for business, it is not eligible for Section 179 and bonus depreciation. Passenger vehicles as normally thought of are scheduled property. But that's always spoken of in the context of those vehicles that have a Gross Vehicle Weight Rating of 6,000 pounds or less and, among other things, have that total depreciation limitation in any one tax year to which the H2 is not limited.

So my own question is this: If the H2 is not a passenger vehicle subject to the depreciation limitations since it has a GVWR in excess of 6,000 pounds, it is also not considered scheduled property? If not, then it may not be restricted to the business use test of greater than 50% in order to take 179 and 30% bonus.

It's an academic question and I will get an answer. It's an unusual circumstance considering the combination of factors, but certainly not bizarre, so I'm quite curious about that.

Give me a few days. (You actually have a year to get the answer since it's 2003 already and is not affecting your decision about whether or not to buy). I've been out of town for a few days, need to get caught up then I'll see what I can find out. No promises one way or the other.

Nancy

"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -Benjamin Franklin, 1759

MAC

01-22-2003, 01:01 AM

Bush Proposal May Cut Tax on S.U.V.'s for Business By DANNY HAKIM

ETROIT, Jan. 20 — The Bush administration's economic plan would increase by 50 percent or more the deductions that small-business owners can take right away on the biggest sport utility vehicles and pickups.

The plan would mean small businesses could immediately deduct the entire price of S.U.V.'s like the Hummer H2, the Lincoln Navigator and the Toyota Land Cruiser, even if the vehicles were loaded with every available option. Or a business owner, taking full advantage, could buy a BMW X5 sport utility vehicle for a few hundred dollars more than a Pontiac Bonneville sedan, after the immediate tax deductions were factored in.

Consider the Hummer H1 as an example of the new deduction. It is one of the largest and most expensive S.U.V.'s, with a base sticker price of $102,581, including destination charge. Under the Bush plan, small-business owners could use all of an annual $75,000 capital equipment deduction toward the purchase; the current equipment deduction allowance is just $25,000.

That is in addition to thousands of dollars in other deductions. Under existing rules, a business could deduct 30 percent from the base price left after the capital equipment deduction, a benefit put in place as part of a post-Sept. 11 stimulus package. In the case of the H1, that would be a further deduction of $8,274.

Finally, 20 percent could be deducted from what is left, part of the business deductions available for automobiles. For the H1, that would be $3,861 more in deductions.

The total would be more than $87,000 in deductions, or about $33,500 in savings in federal taxes alone for buyers in the highest bracket. Under current rules, just less than $60,000 could be deducted.

Deals for cars and small sport utility vehicles are much less appealing. Currently, a business can deduct no more than $7,660 for a car in its first year of service, $4,900 in the second year and less in the succeeding years. The Toyota Prius, which uses a fuel-efficient blend of gasoline and electric power, is eligible for an additional $2,000 clean vehicle deduction. That means a business owner could deduct under half of the $20,500 sticker price of the Prius in the first year of purchase, for about $3,700 worth of federal tax savings for those in the highest tax bracket.

David Friedman, an engineer and analyst at the Union of Concerned Scientists, an environmental group, said the increased deduction for big vehicles was "yet another loophole that the government is keeping open that is increasing our oil dependence."

"Before, it was large enough to drive a small S.U.V. through," he added. "Now it's large enough to drive a Hummer through."

http://www.nytimes.com/ads/digitalpremium5.htm

Fun Dad

01-27-2003, 01:39 PM

Dear Nancy,
Thank you, Thank you, Thank you
What more can I say!

I am going to fire my accountant for not telling me about the accelerated depreciation loophole when I bought my Toyota Tundra two years ago.
I have a question for you. Can I use the accelerated depreciation on a vehicle that I bought new in year 2000? Last year I only wrote off the business use mileage on the Tundra. This year I would like to use the accelerated depreciation loop hole. Can it be done? I know that the vehicle qualifies but I don't know if the fact that I bought it two years ago matters. Also I don't know if the fact that I started depreciating the mileage last year matters. Any Ideas?

I have my eye on the H2 and am considering a future purchase. How do you like it?
Thanks
Dean

98 SNAKE EATER

02-06-2003, 02:28 PM

Can you deduct the intrest on your payments for the vehicle if it is used for business?

Along with either your gas cost, maintenance, etc.?

Rick

------------------
Aztek Yellow Trans Am (new) (http://community.webshots.com/album/30977567AwidVsjOjI)
98 Trans Am WS7 (http://community.webshots.com/album/22779082WuTbSHsNly)
70 Ram Air IV Trans Am (http://community.webshots.com/album/24092276OJKrbnMEGT)
Modified Goped Sport (http://community.webshots.com/album/22651240QbneHHQDfN)
1/10th scale HPI R/C car (http://community.webshots.com/album/36265150ANDOOR)
1/5th scale GB R/C car (http://community.webshots.com/album/23473875SoYsbJbRWb)
FUEL SLUT Video Archive (http://www.fuelslut.com/videos/)
R/C Video Archive (http://www.ownz.com/~mystical/rick/)
Moderator at LS1.com (http://www.ls1.com/forums/index.php?s=) and FUEL SLUT.com (http://www.fuelslut.com)
After 7 months in the NYPD Vehicle Impound, I Finally have my Baby Back!!
http://development.rmci.net/~term/image.phtml/http://community.webshots.com/storage/1/v0/7/76/27/30977627nqlkbnyooY_th.jpg (http://community.webshots.com/album/22779082WuTbSHsNly) http://development.rmci.net/~term/image.phtml/http://community.webshots.com/storage/1/v0/6/53/14/23665314JxIVyFSbPU_th.jpg (http://community.webshots.com/album/36265150ANDOOR) http://development.rmci.net/~term/image.phtml/http://community.webshots.com/storage/1/v0/3/92/79/31339279GKDEaNTbyv_th.jpg (http://community.webshots.com/album/22779082WuTbSHsNly) http://development.rmci.net/~term/image.phtml/http://community.webshots.com/storage/1/v2/3/20/51/36332051QEucir_th.jpg (http://community.webshots.com/album/30977567AwidVsjOjI) http://development.rmci.net/~term/image.phtml/http://community.webshots.com/storage/1/v0/9/34/5/24093405kMhzbxbZQy_th.jpg (http://community.webshots.com/album/24092276OJKrbnMEGT)

H2Norcal

02-07-2003, 01:53 AM

The thing you have to be aware of in this whole "use the H2 as a business write off thing" is you have to use it for 100% business or you have to report your personal mileage in a mileage log which will be used against you as "compensation" on your W2 wages (fringe benefits baby).

In other words, you figure out what mileage you used it for personal use and there is a something called "business vehicle used for personal use compensation form" and you get hammered.

I am not a CPA but I own a business and use the H2 as my business vehicle. My CPA is telling me if you use it more for personal use, the business vehicle could be a tax burden.

Ask about it.

98 SNAKE EATER

08-19-2003, 02:25 AM

I hate to bring up old threads, but this one is definitely worth doing because of all the useful info http://www.elcova.com/infopop/emoticons/icon_smile.gif

We're actually considering doing this right now, but we still have a few questions...

I already know that I'll be able to write off up to $36K of the price, but can this be done partially over the time of financing?

In other words, instead of writing off a full $24K the first year and $12K over the next, could we finance the vehicle for say 6 years and deduct $6k for each year?

And how about deducting interest on payments and cost of maintenance?

Oh yeah, please type s l o w....

I failed basic math in HS http://www.elcova.com/infopop/emoticons/icon_frown.gif

Rick http://www.elcova.com/infopop/emoticons/icon_wink.gif

Kevin W

08-19-2003, 12:35 PM

Hey thre guys,
My father is a CPA and here it is as its explained to me:

Section 179 states that in the first year you can take a 100% deduction from $1.00 - $100,000.
So, you can write off your entire truck in the first year, the only catch is that it cannot create a loss. Example: Truck is worth $55,000 and your company only made a prfit of $40,000, you can only write off $40,000 in the first year. As well, if your company made higher than the total cost of the vehicle, you can write off the entire amount. If you choose not to write off the entire amount in the first year, you can write off up to $7,000 a year after that. ( But he states that those laws change frequently, and if you are able to, write off asa much as you can in the first year)

Disclaimer: This is all info that I just had explained to me by my father who is a CPA, I am not. I design and build houses, so if some of this is a little jumbled, its only because I don't speak accountant language, and am trying to decipher it the best I can.

Hope this helps. If you have any other questions I can try and help as best I can.

Kevin

2003 Pewter H2, Tire relocator, painted hard tire cover, billet gas cover, MC2 chrome hood handles, stainless bumper letters, 15% tinted front windows,pioneer nav/dvd, xm sat, headrest monitors, tv tuner, defenderworx hood latches, side vents, and marker bezels.