PDA

View Full Version : U.S. Hispanic population to triple by 2050


bparker
02-11-2008, 10:56 PM
http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2008-02-11-population-study_N.htm

The U.S. population will soar to 438 million by 2050 and the Hispanic population will triple, according to projections released Monday by the Pew Research Center.
The latest projections by the non-partisan research group are higher than government estimates to date and paint a portrait of an America dramatically different from today's.
The projected growth in the U.S. population ? 303 million today ? will be driven primarily by immigration among all groups except the elderly.
"We're assuming that the rate of immigration will stay roughly constant," says Jeffrey Passel, co-author of the report.
Even if immigration is limited, Hispanics' share of the population will increase because they have higher birth rates than the overall population. That's largely because Hispanic immigrants are younger than the nation's aging baby boom population. By 2030, all 79 million boomers will be at least 65 and the elderly will grow faster than any other age group.



The projections show that by 2050:
?Nearly one in five Americans will have been born outside the USA vs. one in eight in 2005. Sometime between 2020 and 2025, the percentage of foreign-born will surpass the historic peak reached a century ago during the last big immigration wave. New immigrants and their children and grandchildren born in the USA will account for 82% of the population increase from 2005 to 2050.
?Whites who are not Hispanic, now two-thirds of the population, will become a minority when their share drops to 47%. They made up 85% of the population in 1960.
?Hispanics, already the largest minority group, will more than double their share of the population to 29%.
?Blacks will remain 13% of the population. Asians will go to 9% from 5%.
?The gap between the number of working-age people and the children and seniors who depend on them will widen as boomers age. There will be 72 young and elderly for every 100 people of working age by 2050 compared with 59 in 2005. The gap would widen more if immigration slows because immigrants tend to be of working-age, the report said.
The projections are based on detailed assumptions about births, deaths and immigration levels based on recent trends. Those trends can change. For example, a new immigration policy could substantially limit the growth.
"Immigration has long-term consequences on the make-up of the country and the size of the population and we need to take those results in account when we make immigration policy," says Mark Krikorian, executive director of the Center for Immigration Studies, a group that promotes limits on immigration. "Growing our population by 100 million more than we would otherwise is a choice. Immigration is a choice. ? It's all up to us."
The ethnic and racial profile of the nation could change because of inter-marriage. It's not clear how the children and grandchildren of multiracial and multi-ethnic unions will identify themselves in the future.
"We've assumed that the definitions and categories that are being used today will continue to be used in the next 50 years," Passel says. "Fifty years ago, we didn't have the definition for the Hispanic population."
Adds Krikorian: "Will that category of who's white be redefined? What is a non-Hispanic white?"

H2Blondie
02-11-2008, 11:17 PM
And to think...many Americans (white even) don't want a wall!:confused: No wonder we have to dumb down our educational system.

RubHer Yellow Ducky
02-11-2008, 11:48 PM
I hope THIS THREAD doesn't drift or go wild..................

I once saw (but cannot find again) {nor do I know how accurate is is/was}

that one reason of many that Rome fell was that they (Rome) started allowing OTHER languages to be used in the BUSINESS OF RUNNING THE GOVERNMENT of ROME........................

I feel we are on that road with this push 1 for English BULL CRAP...

Desert Dan
02-11-2008, 11:51 PM
Si
No Bueno for USA

CO Hummer
02-11-2008, 11:56 PM
I once saw (but cannot find again) {nor do I know how accurate is is/was}

that one reason of many that Rome fell was that they (Rome) started allowing OTHER languages to be used in the BUSINESS OF RUNNING THE GOVERNMENT of ROME........................

I feel we are on that road with this push 1 for English BULL CRAP...


Although I'm NOT arguing for a bi-lingual system.......I gotta say that is the dumbest explanation I've ever heard of why Rome fell.

RubHer Yellow Ducky
02-12-2008, 12:11 AM
Although I'm NOT arguing for a bi-lingual system.......I gotta say that is the dumbest explanation I've ever heard of why Rome fell.

PLEASE READ ALL the WORDS, VERY SLOWLY !!!!!!!!!!!!!

CO Hummer
02-12-2008, 12:15 AM
I once saw (but cannot find again) {nor do I know how accurate is is/was}

that one reason of many that Rome fell was that they (Rome) started allowing OTHER languages to be used in the BUSINESS OF RUNNING THE GOVERNMENT of ROME........................


Now that you've clarified it, it's still one of the dummer "reasons" I've heard for the fall of Rome.

RubHer Yellow Ducky
02-12-2008, 12:21 AM
Now that you've clarified it, it's still one of the dummer "reasons" I've heard for the fall of Rome.

does Xena shave, is she left or right handed, which breast is bigger ...


http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2406/2146271677_8c46dbdacf_o.jpg (http://calgarygrit.blogspot.com/)
Saturday, April 02, 2005



Vote out Anders

I had the dubious chance to attend a Conservative function where Rob Anders was one of the speakers a few days ago. I have some Conservative friends and I figured it'd be good for a few laughs if nothing else. And Rob did not disappoint.

Maybe it was the fact that it was a Conservative event with no media or maybe he's just naturally insane. Either way, Rob had recently read a book on the decline of the Roman empire and couldn't help drawing parallels between the fall of Rome and modern Canadian society. The reasons Rome fell and the reasons Canada is in crisis today according to Mr. Anders?

Well, Rob started talking about all the splinter languages which formed in Rome and compromised the universal Latin. "He's not going to go there" I said to myself as he started this rant but, surely enough, he did. "Bilingualism is a problem today" Rob said. He complained that plaques that had been unilingual are now English and French and that it "didn't help" that people spoke "Chinese and Arab and other languages too" in Canada.

Completely shocked, he went on to explain why the clothes people wear today are a major problem. Since fewer and fewer people wear "respectable" clothes, there are some major problems on the horizon. This was followed with the predictable complaint about the lack of military spending. Then we got to Rob's favourite topic - "moral decay". "The problem with homosexuality and gay marriage" was that it led to a declining birth rate. He failed to elaborate on how the Romans forced gay people to breed but explained that they had tax breaks such that you didn't pay taxes if you had 5 children. Fair enough, but even with tax breaks, you aren't going to see a lot of gay people having five children since I'm pretty sure I can guess where Rob stands on gay adoption.

Finally, he touched on religion. Religion is on the decline in Canada and this has caused people to lose their moral compass according to Rob. Without religion (and by religion, I'm positive he meant "Christian religion", although he didn't say so), there's no way for people to know what's right or wrong. "You have to feel murder and thievery are wrong" if there's no church to tell you according to Rob. Personally, even though I'm a Liberal, I kind of feel thievery is wrong irrespective of what my Church tells me.

After listening to Rob speak for an evening, I truly hope the Liberals follow around the 10 or 12 most Anders-like Conservative MPs and wait for them to say stuff like this. It's a strategy that can't fail.