Hummer Forums by Elcova  
Forums - Home
Source Decals

Source Motors
Custom. Accessories.

H2 Accessories
H3 Accessories
Other Vehicles

H2 Source

H2 Member Photos
H2 Owners Map
H2 Classifieds
H2 Photo Gallery
SUT Photo Gallery
H2 Details

H2 Club

Chapters
Application

H3 Source

H3 Member Photos
H3 Classifieds
H3 Photo Gallery
H3 Owners Map
H3 Details
H3T Concept

H1 Source

H1 Member Photos
H1 Classifieds
H1 Photo Gallery
H1 Details

General Info

Hummer Dealers
Contact
Advertise

Sponsored Ads










 


Source Motors - custom. accessories.


Go Back   Hummer Forums by Elcova > ETC. Forums > General Off Topic

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #9  
Old 11-02-2005, 11:04 PM
rodster rodster is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Vegas
Posts: 1,571
rodster is off the scale
Default

<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by DRTYFN:
Link to source? </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

The story was posted on freerepublic.com and linked back to azconservative.org. It also appears in a number of blogs. No mainstream outlets found on a Google news search.
http://www.azconservative.org/Semmens14.htm

This is an interesting story (or at least it is to me) and if true, the city is in a world of crap. Best case scenario the city has to give the money back (lots of luck collecting; we’ll probably write it off like a third world debt). Middle case scenario, the city has to give the money back and is then debarred and suspended for a period of time from receiving federal aid (that ain’t gonna happen). Worse case, someone is going to jail and the city will still have to give the money back.

If the city received fed money for the stated purpose of hiring sworn officers and if in fact they diverted that money for other purposes, the Mayor's quoted statement is a confession, not an explanation. All that remains to be determined is intent and the scope of the fraud and any potential misappropriation.

That all now said, the whole thing doesn't sound plausible. N.O. would most likely not have received that much money for that purpose in the most recent fiscal year. They've no doubt been through at least a few OMB-required audits and those audits should have uncovered the violations.

Now, if they have been through audits and no violations were noted, well, that's a deception of a different color…

Or at least that’s my opinion.
__________________
\'05 SUT
Reply With Quote
 


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin Version 3.0.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.