 |
|

07-05-2006, 09:36 PM
|
Hummer Authority
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Fcuk 'em, leave 'em pissed
Posts: 1,282
|
|
Re: Ken Lay is dead...
|

07-05-2006, 09:40 PM
|
 |
Hummer Guru
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 6,358
|
|
Re: Ken Lay is dead...
Quote:
Originally Posted by ShaggyX
|
Sorry Shaggy, just saw on your local news about your house being on fire, that really sucks 
__________________
I don't care about the "Jeep thing"  as long as my mail is on time!!!
Slate Blue H3 Adventure w/sunroof, Monsoon/NAV, DVD and marker lights
|

07-05-2006, 10:39 PM
|
 |
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 24,247
|
|
Re: Ken Lay is dead...
Quote:
Originally Posted by ShaggyX
I would imagine 401k's, CD's, and MM Accounts would be a safer...smarter way to go. Return isn't nearly as good, but you are less likely to lose everything.
|
That's just stupid!
Just as I expected. You seem to have this reverse idealogy with money matters, anyway.
|

07-05-2006, 10:58 PM
|
Hummer Authority
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Fcuk 'em, leave 'em pissed
Posts: 1,282
|
|
Re: Ken Lay is dead...
Why would a steady return, low risk savings be stupid, while higher return...higher risk savings be smart? Wouldn't consistent 5% return be safer/better than a 20% return that could turn into a -100% return? Seriously.
|

07-05-2006, 11:48 PM
|
 |
Hummer Messiah
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Virginia Beach
Posts: 37,474
|
|
Re: Ken Lay is dead...
Quote:
Originally Posted by ShaggyX
Why would a steady return, low risk savings be stupid, while higher return...higher risk savings be smart? Wouldn't consistent 5% return be safer/better than a 20% return that could turn into a -100% return? Seriously.
|
It's called diversifacation. A relatively new concept.
__________________
"My reading of history convinces me that most bad government results from too much government."---Thomas Jefferson
|

07-05-2006, 11:48 PM
|
Hummer Guru
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: nonpiker
Posts: 5,900
|
|
Re: Ken Lay is dead...
Quote:
Originally Posted by ShaggyX
Why would a steady return, low risk savings be stupid, while higher return...higher risk savings be smart? Wouldn't consistent 5% return be safer/better than a 20% return that could turn into a -100% return? Seriously.
|
I think that thought process directly relates to your age....you talk estate planning/investing like your 75  j/k
|

07-06-2006, 12:39 AM
|
 |
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 24,247
|
|
Re: Ken Lay is dead...
Quote:
Originally Posted by ShaggyX
Why would a steady return, low risk savings be stupid, while higher return...higher risk savings be smart? Wouldn't consistent 5% return be safer/better than a 20% return that could turn into a -100% return? Seriously.
|
I was referring to YOU being stupid. A 401K is nothing like a MM account or a CD which are both banking products.
One of the reasons so many people are pissed off about the Enron deal is that much of the Enron employees' 401Ks were vested in Enron stock. 
|

07-06-2006, 12:47 AM
|
 |
Hummer Guru
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Location: florida
Posts: 2,606
|
|
Re: Ken Lay is dead...
|

07-05-2006, 10:56 PM
|
 |
Hummer Messiah
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Federal penitentiary
Posts: 21,046
|
|
Re: Ken Lay is dead...
Quote:
Originally Posted by ShaggyX
|
Shaggy,
You'll be set up nicely with your military pension. Don't worry about it.
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:09 AM.
|