 |
|

01-05-2007, 10:13 PM
|
 |
Hummer Professional
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Playing Army all over the world
Posts: 453
|
|
Re: Jeep versus H3
I rarely take acception to post here but Scout II's were great trail vehicles. 165 HP but well over 350 LB of torque. dana 's front and rear. Now as I slightly age I would never consider one, road manners were equal to a pig and the body rusted as you watched. It had a fully boxed frame, easily lifted.....
I love my 3, probably the best all around vehicle I have owned, but the Scout was a fine vehicle. Remember, in the wise words of Sir Rodney King, "Can't we all get along"
__________________
Life is tough enough without being stupid
Superior Blue, Adventure Package, Roof mounted off road lights, Auto, 6 Disk Monsoon with XM, Brush Guard, Tire Cover, Husky mud flaps, flat steps, black fuel door.
Other Cars.....
1980 Triumph TR8 3.5 litre V8
|

01-05-2007, 10:20 PM
|
 |
Hummer Expert
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Southern Cali
Posts: 652
|
|
Re: Jeep versus H3
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scouts Out
I rarely take acception to post here but Scout II's were great trail vehicles. 165 HP but well over 350 LB of torque. dana 's front and rear. Now as I slightly age I would never consider one, road manners were equal to a pig and the body rusted as you watched. It had a fully boxed frame, easily lifted.....
I love my 3, probably the best all around vehicle I have owned, but the Scout was a fine vehicle. Remember, in the wise words of Sir Rodney King, "Can't we all get along"
|
Haha thats just it I think everyone is getting along great, not too much name calling, and just a good ol shop talkin group, checking numbers. I had a 73 Scout II. 345, 4 speed, good stump puller, again like my FJ40 much like driving a tractor, but agreed one of the best factory wheeling rigs ever produced. 
|

01-05-2007, 10:41 PM
|
 |
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 24,247
|
|
Re: Jeep versus H3
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scouts Out
I rarely take acception to post here but Scout II's were great trail vehicles.
|
compared to what? a VW bug?
There was nothing great about them except that their skin was thick. They were bare bones simple design. We had a fire under the dash, choke cable break, seat bolts break and it simply didn't articulate for a solid axle vehicle. It was horridly unbalanced on the trail and bounced too damn much.
Don't get your feelings hurt. We had a '76 for parts (I think the years are right) and ran the '77. It just didn't cut the mustard unless you modded it a lot which I couldn't afford to do in High School.
|

01-06-2007, 02:56 AM
|
 |
Hummer Expert
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Posey, CA Southern Sierras
Posts: 705
|
|
Re: Jeep versus H3
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scouts Out
I rarely take acception to post here but Scout II's were great trail vehicles. 165 HP but well over 350 LB of torque. dana 's front and rear. Now as I slightly age I would never consider one, road manners were equal to a pig and the body rusted as you watched. It had a fully boxed frame, easily lifted.....
I love my 3, probably the best all around vehicle I have owned, but the Scout was a fine vehicle. Remember, in the wise words of Sir Rodney King, "Can't we all get along"
|
I gotta agree, I built a few myself, they're hell bent for stout. Rust though, oh geez, you couldn't keep a Scout from rusting out. I just gave up and let mine oxidize. I had full cage, winch, lockers front and rear, a 304, granny low five speed and Dana 300. It was killer. One thing it couldn't do, no how, no way, and what the H3 does soooooo much better, is sidehill. It's one reason that I have no plans to lift my H3. Some folks have a higher pucker capability than I do. Low as I can go and still get there does it for me.
__________________
|

01-06-2007, 03:01 AM
|
 |
Hummer Messiah
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: PDX
Posts: 2,367,817
|
|
Re: Jeep versus H3
I notice he suddenly got quiet. 
|

01-06-2007, 03:46 AM
|
 |
Hummer Authority
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: SL,UT
Posts: 1,197
|
|
Re: Jeep versus H3
A fawkin waste of 5 minutes of my life, reading this ghey ass thread.
Another troll hiding under the guise of being interested in a 3, while throwing out insults.
Come in here like I give a fawk about his questions and veiled insults. Anybody can write on the internet. Go wheel a fawkin 3, rent one, go with a 3 owner if you even have a rig at all.
I wheel with Jeeps. My 3 is better in lots of terrain, their Jeeps keep up in some ****. The Rubi's are capable and good climbers if they don't tip over.
Problem with Jeep is quality, it's shiat. Modify the fawker and the factory doesn't want to honor the warranty. Fawk this troll.
__________________
Black Sheep Hummer Squadron 
|

01-06-2007, 03:52 AM
|
Hummer Guru
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,980
|
|
Re: Jeep versus H3
Quote:
Originally Posted by 0313H3
A fawkin waste of 5 minutes of my life, reading this ghey ass thread.
Another troll hiding under the guise of being interested in a 3, while throwing out insults.
Come in here like I give a fawk about his questions and veiled insults. Anybody can write on the internet. Go wheel a fawkin 3, rent one, go with a 3 owner if you even have a rig at all.
I wheel with Jeeps. My 3 is better in lots of terrain, their Jeeps keep up in some ****. The Rubi's are capable and good climbers if they don't tip over.
Problem with Jeep is quality, it's shiat. Modify the fawker and the factory doesn't want to honor the warranty. Fawk this troll.
|
Lol.....X2 Fuck this troll..
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:18 AM.
|