![]() |
Ok, ok, it's a 1982 issue of Popular Mechanics. Still, it just proves that the H3's 0-60 time isn't "dangerous" and it's not a slow slug. What it does prove is that people have become jaded and want a 6 second 0-60 time out of a trail going machine.
My my, how times have changed. It sure is a blast to read about how fast we used to go, and how slow we are now!
Ok, ok, it's a 1982 issue of Popular Mechanics. Still, it just proves that the H3's 0-60 time isn't "dangerous" and it's not a slow slug. What it does prove is that people have become jaded and want a 6 second 0-60 time out of a trail going machine.
My my, how times have changed. It sure is a blast to read about how fast we used to go, and how slow we are now!
10 second range was considered decent.
But today is 2005 and 0-60 in 10 seconds is mediocre at best. But a Hummer is not designed to maximize 0-60 times. All the Hummers (including the H2)are slow in this regard on the road.
I really feel the difference when I get in my Boxster S (0-60 in mid 5 second range) or my wife's Jag X-type 3.0(0-60 in mid 7 second range). Something about the H3 that I still enjoy driving everyday.
Different toys for different purposes for sure.
Steve
Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Display Modes
Posting Rules